With the approach of the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development, Taiwan Advocates, an advocacy group chaired by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), has become more vociferous in its pleas to the government to not put cross-strait deregulation ahead of issues of sovereignty. This response reflects Lee's anxieties regarding the possibility of closer cross-strait economic relations.
In this era of globalization, a country's self-imposed trade restrictions constitute an obsolete policy, violating free market principles. However, Taiwan's situation is unique as its main trading partner is not a "normal" democracy. Its main trading partner also happens to be its main enemy whose many missiles and "united front" tactics threaten to wipe Taiwan off the map.
There also exists an overwhelming disparity between the two sides in terms of their population, land and economies. Such disparities render a comparison of Taiwan and China to the former East and West Germany inappropriate. If Taiwan's capital were to flow to China to the point where it becomes utterly dependent on China, Taipei would be in a very dangerous predicament. Beijing could then force Taiwan to accept the policy of "one country, two systems" through economic means.
Some believe that only by increasing Taiwan's Chinese investment can it further its economic development. But didn't Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore earn the collective title, the "Four Asian Tigers," based on diversified investment strategies? Under Lee's "no haste, be patient" policy during his 12-year presidency, didn't Taiwan's economy grow at an average yearly rate of 10 percent?
China is not the only "global factory." What's more, its economy is not as miraculous as local pro-unification media would have us believe. According to the German Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI), the "bad loan rate" for the Chinese banking sector ranges between 40 percent to 50 percent, which translates into a loss of about US$500 billion. The Financial Times newspaper reported that China's actual losses maybe as high as US$900 billion. Taiwan's bad loan ratio, on the other hand, dropped in 2004 to 4.35 percent.
According to the Rand Corp, China's unemployment rate has risen above 23 percent while Taiwan's has fallen below 4 percent, setting a new five-year low. The Economist Intelligence Unit, the British think tank attached to The Economist magazine, has predicted that Taiwan's economic growth rate will be 4 percent this year, and 4.3 percent next year, which is higher than Hong Kong's current 4.1 percent.
The IMF is more optimistic, predicting that Taiwan's annual economic growth rate will reach 4.5 percent in both this year and next. Additionally, 250 million of the 1.3 billion people in China make less than US$1 a day, with 700 million more earning less than US$2 a day. Almost half of all Chinese do not have any medical insurance whatsoever.
Japan began adjusting its investment policy last year, gradually shifting its focus from China to India. Even Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe -- who is widely expected to succeed Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in September -- reviewed Tokyo's China policy in his new book, To a Beautiful Country, calling on Japan to not allow Beijing to achieve its political goals through economic means.
If Taiwan puts all of its eggs in China's basket, such a situation is likely to become the biggest political bargaining chip at China's disposal in its bid to annex Taiwan. Additionally, corruption in China is endemic and threatens to lay waste to the Chinese economy -- an economic storm waits in the wings. If Taiwan only becomes aware of this fact when the storm hits, it will be too late.
Cao Changqing is a freelance writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS