Last week, Democratic Progres-sive Party (DPP) Chairman Yu Shyi-kun abruptly announced that his party should form a "Green Justice Alliance" with the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), and even advocated a merger with the TSU. However, the TSU has mixed feelings about Yu's proposition. Judging from the party's past cooperation with the DPP, I cannot help but think that this is a calculated attempt to shift the focus away from the DPP's problems.
When the DPP is faring well, it rarely pays any attention to the TSU. In times of crisis, however, it suddenly remembers us. This month marks the fifth anniversary of the TSU's founding. Before the meeting between President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) in February last year, the TSU threw its weight behind the DPP on grounds of safeguarding Taiwan's first localized regime. We also went all-out to help Chen win re-election in 2004.
Unfortunately, the DPP turns selfish whenever an election is around the corner, taking advantage of the TSU's localization stance while unilaterally tearing up cooperation agreements with the TSU and even stealing the support base we have worked so hard to build up.
The TSU learned its lesson in the 2004 legislative elections. The DPP has never treated the TSU with genuine respect, regarding it only as a pawn to be manipulated. Now, with a record of poor government and having become entangled in corruption scandals, it has the gall to ask the TSU to sacrifice itself and join the DPP.
Since the allegations surrounding Chen's son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (趙建銘) were brought to light, both Chen's and the DPP's approval ratings have plunged to unprecedented lows. Although Chen escaped the presidential recall campaign unscathed, a series of corruption scandals are still under investigation and the evidence collected has placed the first family in a very unfavorable position.
Meanwhile, the government's policy implementation has not improved, the economy remains in a slump and the gap between rich and poor is widening. Some of the DPP's members are also involved in corruption scandals, infighting continues and the issue of nominal party members remains unresolved. With the party unable to put its own house in order, how can it possibly talk about merging with the TSU?
How can the TSU, a strong proponent of clean governance, merge with the corrupt DPP at this juncture? If it did, it would only show the same contempt for justice and the localization cause.
The TSU is an independent party upholding the cause of localization, clean governance, and people's welfare and livelihoods. The party does not rule out collaborating with any political party as long as the cause benefits the general public. However, whether the TSU enters into such cooperation will depend on the will of the Taiwanese and if the party in question is clean.
The DPP's call for a coalition or merger with the TSU may have been aimed at striking a chord in softhearted pan-green supporters who cannot bear to see a divided green camp and who will expect the TSU to obediently do as it is told. But at a deeper level, if the DPP fails to overhaul itself and instead only plans to devour the TSU, it will only bring about the disintegration of the localized government. I wonder if this is what pan-green supporters want to see.
The TSU is a friend who gives forthright admonitions, and we will not blindly follow the DPP. Based on the independent nature of political parties and their responsibilities to the people, any party can outline policy proposals on which it wants to collaborate with the TSU, such as the national economic revival program, the probe into the KMT's ill-gotten assets, the national flood-control project and anything else that can improve people's livelihoods.
The TSU will definitely welcome with open arms any proposal beneficial to the nation's development. But if the DPP is only trying to shift the focus away from its problems, Yu could have saved his breath. The TSU is not a pawn at the DPP's command, and the DPP would do better to mind its factional issues and corruption problems.
David Kuo is the director of the TSU Policy Center.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS