The political crises surrounding President Chen Shui-bian (
There is no disputing that the DPP faces a political crisis of unprecedented severity. It is also true that this crisis is due to Chen's mismanagement of state affairs. The president cannot escape responsibility for this, but so far his failures have been political and moral, not legal.
In the political sphere, Chen has already delegated some of his powers, heralding the arrival of the post-Chen era. In the private sphere, Chen and his family are being worn down by the pressure being put on them by political foes and public opinion. But ultimately, Chen himself has not broken the law, and finding him guilty by association is unreasonable.
Some time ago, Chen announced that he was withdrawing from the DPP's affairs, so even if he were to leave the party, it would be no more than a symbolic gesture. Chen and the DPP are inseparable, so that even if he were to withdraw, the DPP would still be enmeshed in the current crisis. His departure would not help the party regain the people's trust; it would merely give the media and opposition more opportunities to kick the man when he's down. Throwing Chen out of the DPP would benefit neither Chen nor the party.
In finding a way out of its crisis, the DPP should consider changing the system rather than simply blaming Chen. Whatever happens to Chen, the political scene and party affairs are now entering the "post-Chen" era. The DPP National Convention, which begins on Saturday, should deliberate on the model of collective leadership operating through the Central Standing Committee.
In the past, the DPP was regarded as an electoral machine. It now needs to become a mechanism for policy coordination. From major policy decision-making by the Cabinet to major legislation, deliberation should proceed through the coordinating and negotiating platform of the party's Central Standing Committee. This would allow the executive, the legislative caucus and the party to be consistent in its actions. This is especially important since the DPP is in a minority in the legislature and does not benefit from having a strong leader. It will also help the party escape the criticism that it is led by one man's will, and that the Presidential Office routinely interferes in its affairs.
Rule through committee might be less efficient, but it provides greater transparency and more prudent policymaking. If the DPP misses this opportunity to become a more integrated and unified party, especially now that it has lost its reputation for honesty, it will leave itself open to being cut down by any of its rivals.
Chen has said that he will not attend the party congress. In any case, the question of whether Chen will resign from the party is not important. It is more important to consider whether the DPP will be able to operate smoothly, eliminate administrative obstacles and carry out its policies without Chen.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS