As a small island nation, Taiwan has always expressed the desire to ensure that its society competes with the rest of the world -- economically, culturally and in some cases politically. It encourages its diplomatic allies to vote in its favor at the UN, which is baffling to me, since Taiwan seems to favor closer trading relations with China and not small, insignificant diplomatic allies like those it has in Africa and Central America.
Part of Taiwan's thrust to keep up with the rest of the world is to ensure that its citizens are bilingual, thereby adding a very important asset to the human resource potential of its people as they seek to compete with the rest of Asia.
English teaching by Westerners is obviously in high demand, which is why many North Americans are able to find lucrative contracts here and make a contribution to the enhancement of the educational infrastructure.
It is totally surprising and reprehensible to think, however that many cram schools and other organizations in Taiwan still practice and endorse racial segregation when hiring Westerners for English-teaching jobs.
The concept that black people are incapable of teaching English is backward, narrow-minded and especially unfortunate for a society that claims to have one of the most developed economies of Asia -- if not the world -- while at the same time putting a high premium on education.
An individual who is well-educated should invariably have an open mind, think rationally and behave humanely. Since Taiwanese value the teachings of Confucius so much, they should appreciate his teachings on mutual respect and humility.
There have been several occasions when black teachers who were holders of US or Canadian passports were told over the phone that particular jobs were available, and that they would be required to start immediately. Upon going to the school and presenting the necessary documentation, they were then informed that the job was no longer available.
Additionally, many schools socialize their students into thinking that somehow all people of color, whether they are from the West or from Southeast Asia, are somehow inferior, less educated, less intelligent and less human.
This narrow-minded thinking is reminiscent of the US in the early 1960s, where segregation was socially acceptable. Segregation in many cram schools which proudly call themselves "American Schools" is acceptable in Taiwan. It's safe to suggest, therefore, that Taiwan is one of the most racist places on earth, as reflected in their employment ethics.
In Taiwan, you are judged by the color of your skin and not by the content of your character. It would serve the government well, if it wants to maintain a positive image of Taiwan -- especially in the US, its most valuable ally -- to review the nation's labor laws so that they conform to universally accepted practices of equal employment.
The issue of discrimination in English teaching is only one aspect of racist attitudes in Taiwan. These attitudes leave a very negative impression of the island's people and their desire to be viewed as one of the most welcoming nations in Asia.
I have witnessed first hand the discrimination against people from Southeast Asia and Africa, many of whom are employed in blue-collar jobs, because of the color of their skin.
If many Taiwanese employers are bent on being segregationist in the workplace, then they should add a disclaimer to their advertisements which simply states, "No Blacks" or "Whites Only."
Kevin Sealey
Taipei
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s