Taiwan's first-ever presidential recall bid has come to a close. What concerns the public now is not so much the redrawing of political lines and agendas, but how the recall proceedings have further strained relations between the pan-greens and pan-blues. Some believe that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has sought to shift the pressure from the scandals off himself and re-exert influence over his party by mobilizing pan-green supporters and re-framing the recall motion as a battle between localization and sinification supporters.
I believe that the pan-green supporters' reaction to recent events is a sign of their frustration with the constant barrage of biased news against Chen and his administration by the "pan-blue influenced" media.
Corruption allegations against the Chen administration have obviously disheartened pan-green supporters -- after all, the pan-green camp was elected on a platform of "clean governance." This image has been tarnished in the face of mounting allegations against Chen's family members and aides. The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) dwindling poll numbers reflect the public's disillusionment with the ruling party.
However, it should be noted that the politicians and TV pundits who have brought these scandals to light also lack credibility. Many of these allegations were often made with scant evidence to back them up, and the public was encouraged to connect the dots in the absence of any genuine proof.
Media outlets have also run unfiltered segments on these alleged scandals non-stop, relentlessly needling and angering pan-green viewers. The recall motion presented the perfect opportunity for fed-up pan-green supporters to finally come forward and speak out against the media's biased and unprofessional coverage.
The pan-blue camp, together with certain media outlets, has sought to undermine the administration by attempting to paint, piece by piece, an ugly image of a scandal-infested presidency.
However, I would like to suggest to media outlets that have accused Chen of manipulating his supporters and deepening the divide between the pan-greens and the pan-blues to draw attention away from the scandals that they reflect on how they themselves have manipulated public opinion through biased journalism.
Media personalities or politicians should think about their political accountability before spewing out accusations, and the content of their accusations should be submitted to the proper authorities for official scrutiny.
News outlets should fulfill the basic requirements of fact-checking and verification. They should also allow the defendants to respond to the charges as a means of demonstrating journalistic fairness and objectivity.
The media have thrown any semblance of discipline out the window, as shown by the sheer amount of airtime given to personal attacks initiated by politicians and commentators who seem to think that "supplying evidence" and carrying out "independent verification" are foreign concepts.
As a result of this undisciplined reporting, the masses have difficulty distinguishing between what is true and false, and the media have failed to perform their most important function of presenting news accurately and conscientiously.
However, I am not proposing that the media should make their own political judgment or form their own political stand. Rather, when conducting news reports, the media should maintain a balanced structure that gives equal play to various news sources and parties, and work for the promotion of social values and the public interest. This is what is called "media ethics" -- a universal value that all media outlets should pursue.
It is a pity that the local media have chosen to ignore such ethics, resulting not only in the loss of their authority to ensure social justice, but also in their being exploited by certain politicians as a means to intensify ethnic and political divisions.
If media outlets continue to focus merely on the blue-green divide, how can we blame the public for questioning their veracity?
Lee Wen-chung is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS