Early last month, representatives from the Northern, Southern, Central and Eastern Taiwan societies visited former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) -- the spiritual leader of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) -- to invite him to the inauguration of the Taiwan Society on June 18, and to ask about the possibility of him sharing the stage with President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Lee did not respond directly, but he condemned Chen's administration for corruption, implying that he was unwilling to stand side by side with Chen. He did not change his mind even when Northern Taiwan Society deputy director Chen Gau-tzu (陳昭姿) begged him to attend the ceremony for the sake of Taiwan. We were all very disappointed.
Are Chen and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) really corrupt beyond repair? After the exposure of alleged scandals by pro-unification media and pro-China politicians, only former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (陳哲男) and the president's son-in-law, Chao Chien-ming (趙建銘), remain in detention. Former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Ma Yung-cheng (馬永成) was released after 12 hours of questioning. He was not detained, and did not have to put up bail.
As former minister of justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) once said, about 70 percent to 80 percent of prosecutors and investigators are pan-blue-camp supporters. If Ma really were guilty, how could he have walked out of the Taipei District Prosecutors' Office a free man? If the alleged Sogo voucher scandal is true, why has no evidence of first lady Wu Shu-jen's (吳淑珍) "crimes" been found after such a long investigation?
The pro-unification media have strongly questioned Ma Yung-cheng's interference in personnel affairs, as if it were a serious crime. But Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) headquarters was the power center during Lee's presidency, and the party's interference in personnel affairs through its business management committee director, Liu Tai-ying (劉泰英), was even worse.
After Chen Shui-bian came to office in 2000, power shifted from KMT headquarters to the Presidential Office. Ma was simply exercising his power as provided by law. Unless he is proven to have offered services in exchanges for bribes, what law has he violated?
After Chen Shui-bian came to power, he said he would roughly halve his monthly salary from NT$822,000 to NT$448,800 (US$25,490 to US$13,900) starting Jan. 1, 2001. That means he will have given up more than NT$33 million over his presidency. Because of this, the accusations of corruption are unconvincing.
As for the first lady, she has a good disposition, and is outspoken and straightforward. But she does not know how to avoid public suspicion.
Our defense of Chen is not a matter of a personality cult. Indeed, although he embodies the Taiwanese people's wish to be their own masters, when he makes mistakes we condemn him severely.
The accusation that Chen only nominally works for localization and is more focused on building a personality cult is ridiculous. Looking at his lifelong contributions to and sacrifices for Taiwan's democratic development, how could anyone call him a fake localization activist? Then there's the accusation against us of promoting Chen's personality cult, which is an unacceptable insult.
If pro-unification media and politicians bring Chen down without evidence of a crime being committed, Taiwanese identity will collapse. The situation would not be saved even if Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) succeeded him and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) became premier. The TSU should think twice before attacking Chen.
Kuo Chang-feng is a member of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers