The square in front of Kaohsiung's National Science and Technology Museum was much more raucous than usual on the last Sunday of last month. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma slammed President Chen Shui-bian's (
"Public discontent is boiling over, justifying a recall motion [against the president]," Ma said.
Such comments conveniently ignore the fact that the 6.6 percent economic growth rate under KMT rule in the 1960s was a product of the "no haste, be patient" policy, which Ma and the KMT today vehemently oppose. What's more, the 3.6 percent economic growth rate under DPP rule can be attributed to the Chen administration's espousal of economic strategies pushed for by the KMT, such as "active opening," "confident deregulation"and "courageously going west."
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was a vocal proponent of Taiwanese sovereignty when he headed the KMT and the nation, and opposed the establishment of Taiwan as an Asia-Pacific regional operations center with China as its hinterland. Under Lee's rule, Taiwan's stock market soared above 10,000 points in 1997 and 1999 as he managed to keep Taiwan's reliance on China as an export market below 25 percent of total exports. Although this was still not entirely satisfactory, it resulted in better global positioning for Taiwanese businesses.
All of this changed when the DPP became the ruling party in 2000. The party went against the grain of Lee's policies of restraint and began dancing to the KMT's tune, establishing direct cross-strait charter flights, liberalizing Taiwanese investment in China, and otherwise fostering economic integration.
And what have the consequences been? Today, Taiwan's export reliance on China has reached 37.8 percent of total exports, while trade with the US, Europe, and Southeast Asia has steadily declined. For Taiwan, globalization has become synonymous with Sinicization. Local enterprises quit the country and set up shop in China, leaving behind a gaping investment vacuum.
These are the circumstances under which Taiwan's growth rate has slowed to almost half of what it used to be in the roaring 1980s. In other words, the DPP's present troubles are the result of the economic roadmap Ma drew up for the KMT. The true irony in all this is that Ma is slamming the DPP for doing precisely what he has advocated that his own party do.
Last New Year's, Chen introduced his notion of "active management" to the public, with the goal of lessening Taiwan's dependence on China and departing from the pan-blues' economic roadmap.
The "active management" policy is focused on pushing growth back up toward 6.6 percent and fostering self-reliance; however, it was met with stiff resistance from not only pro-China elements but even from within the pan-green camp. Six months have passed since the strategy was touted, but it never got off the ground. Instead, old policies remain and the economy continues to hemorrhage.
The pan-blues, however, have nothing to celebrate. The economic slowdown brought on by the "active opening" policy has exposed the pan-blues' economic roadmap as a farce, and if they were to oversee liberalization themselves, the damage to the economy would be even more severe.
This is because their liberalization vis-a-vis China would be even more pronounced; they would usher in direct flights immediately and promote more integration, including allowing companies to invest more of their net value in China beyond the current 40 percent cap and scrapping other investment restrictions. Their position is, "Liberalize completely, and integrate completely with China. That's the only way to save Taiwan!" A number of DPP government officials feel the same way.
Is Taiwan's only road to salvation complete integration with China, as the pan-blues and some pan-greens would have us believe?
That would be like saying that after partially undressing and so feeling chilly, we need to be utterly nude in order to feel warm again.
I call on our DPP government officials to put their focus back on Taiwan, and derive lessons from what Ma shouted and screamed about at the Kaohsiung rally. If the DPP-led government is truly unable to buck the influence of big business and the pro-China media and continues following the KMT's economic roadmap, then Taiwan's economy will continue to suffer, a lesson history has already taught us. Taiwanese businesses may prosper in China, but for those remaining in Taiwan, taking up blue-collar work will be the only choice.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Max Hirsch
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS