Taiwan's unprecedented presidential recall vote was a stand-off between those who oppose and support President Chen Shui-bian (
Unfortunately, a clique of irresponsible politicians and political commentators have added fuel to the fire by describing the case as an ethnic clash between Taiwanese and Mainlanders.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) believes that no specific political party or individuals could or should monopolize or damage the nation's democratic system. The fundamental principle of democracy is that the people are the masters of the nation, and that democracy cannot be used by political parties or leaders to manipulate the public.
In other words, government and leaders in a democracy derive their power from the people, and the transition of power is the result of democratic elections. The true meaning of democracy is that no one person can be "the son of Taiwan" and that when a leader does not do a good job, he or she should be replaced.
The TSU strongly opposed the recent pan-blue drive, which nominally aimed to recall the president. Actually, the drive was part of their political warfare intended to incite political unrest and mobilize ethnic support in an early warm-up ahead of next year's legislative elections and the 2008 presidential election. However, the party also cannot support a "fake" localization stance that only aims to create an idolatry of certain leaders, incites strong emotions, is reluctant to seek out the truth and engages in political manipulation with no respect for the rule of law.
If there is evidence to prove the current allegations that Chen and his wife are involved in wrongdoing or corrupt practices, then the TSU will stand firm and act in good conscience, by solemnly demanding that Chen step down as he has promised. The integrity and sincerity of the national leader is the embodiment of Taiwan's democracy and justice, and thus is not only a matter of the president's own behavior.
As an independent political party, the TSU will not sit idly by and watch the corrupt practices of top officials spin out of control. Therefore, we advocate that there should be no limit to the scope of investigations in order to maintain the political stability of the nation.
The economic problems and deterioration of social order over the past six years have caused Taiwan's democracy to take several steps backward.
Each vote is no longer equal and constitutional amendments are creating difficulties for localized governments. The same problems have also led to the scandals surrounding the consolidation of financial holding firms, the favoring of big business over small and medium enterprises and traditional industries, and trade policies that tip in China's favor.
The curtailment of compulsory military service, which is aimed at winning more votes, has been manipulated by a few egotistical people, which has destroyed military unity and morale and led to dwindling defense capabilities. Empty promises to disadvantaged groups, farmers, fishermen and blue collar workers have disappointed the TSU just as much as the general public.
The public must now ask whether or not Chen and his administration are truly standing with the people and whether they have done all they can to protect the nation's sovereignty and public interests.
Therefore, the TSU called for Chen and his administration to undertake soul-searching, actively combat corruption, maintain justice and reflect the opinion of a majority of Taiwanese.
The party favored neither the irrational recall motion against Chen nor the DPP's sensationalist strategy to consolidate its leadership. This is why the TSU decided to adhere to the cardinal issue of right and wrong by casting invalid ballots.
To solve the blue-green divide that has existed for six years and clarify allegations against Chen and his family, we solemnly and earnestly ask the following.
Chen should submit a new list of nominees to the Control Yuan and work with the leaders of all political parties to set up a system for appointing independent prosecutors, so that the corruption allegations that have pervaded society and the media in recent years and that involve Chen's good name, the government's image and the corruption of political parties finally can be independently investigated.
The political situation must be stabilized, and the nation, society and the general public must be allowed to go about their daily lives while our democracy is nurtured back to health and consolidated. This would be for the good of Taiwan and the Taiwanese people.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS