On May 9, the UN General Assembly elected members from 47 nations to oversee the Human Rights Council. The newly created council replaced the Human Rights Commission, and its first meeting took place on June 19 in Geneva.
International human rights groups are very concerned about whether the council will be able to carry out its tasks free from political interference or manipulation by states known to be human rights abusers.
Prior to the council elections, incidents involving certain countries opposed to seeing rights abusers on the council underscored what a political hot potato the new body is. While the US announced it would boycott the council elections, Human Rights Watch criticized the General Assembly's move to elect China, Cuba, Russia, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia and Iran to the council.
The US believed that the membership criteria for the council were too lax and failed to screen out rights abusers, since the backing of only half of the 191 UN member states is needed to join the council. The US wanted to raise the bar by requiring council applicants to win the support of two-thirds of the UN's membership.
It was truly a pity that other UN members ignored the US' recommendation. The result was that 22 of the 47 countries elected to the council are listed by Freedom House as "not free" or "partly free" nations.
Among the "not free" are China, Algeria, Tunisia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Cameroon and Cuba. "Partly free" members include Morocco, Nigeria, Zambia, Bangladesh, Jordan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Ecuador and Guatemala.
So close to one-half of the council members are regarded by international human rights groups as rights abusers. Whether the council can carry out its mandate and avoid manipulation or interference by rights-abusing nations will determine its success or failure in the eyes of the international community.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the New Century Foundation and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times
RSS