After surviving the opposition's attempt to oust him on Tuesday in the country's first-ever presidential recall vote, this is not the time for President Chen Shui-bian (
With less than two years left in office, Chen needs to get down to business and work to regain the people's confidence in the integrity of his Democratic Progressive Party administration and its ability to govern.
Prior to Tuesday's vote, Chen said that he would seek to push cross-party consultations and cross-strait talks. After the vote, he once again apologized for the political and social upheaval -- much as he did in his televised address to the nation on June 20.
While all his pledges and vows sound nice, less talk and more action is what the country needs to recover from the past few weeks of political turmoil triggered by allegations of corruption against Chen's close associates and family members. Repeated apologies can too easily be interpreted by the public as a sign of incompetence.
After all, what Taiwan needs is not an apologetic president but one who is worthy of the public's respect, who gets work done and delivers on his promises.
People are forgetful, but not that forgetful. Many still remember and hold Chen to the pledges he made late last month -- to engage in introspection, no longer exercise any power beyond what is expressly defined by the Constitution for the role of the president and to reorganize the power structure of his administration in a bid to improve the image of his office.
Just because the crisis caused by the recall vote now appears to be over, this does not mean that Chen can forget what he has promised.
The president should start transforming his pledges into concrete action and re-equipping himself with the kind of determination he so often displayed when he was Taipei mayor.
Sure, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party have yet to do their jobs -- in terms of getting their legislators to review and pass the NT$3.7 trillion (US$113.3 billion) budget for state-owned enterprises, NT$100.7 billion for major infrastructure projects and NT$44.9 billion for flood-prevention efforts, including the dredging of Shihmen Reservoir.
But by the same token, there are tasks at hand for Chen as well. For starters, Chen should send new Control Yuan nominees to the legislature and appoint a new state public prosecutor-general.
True leadership shines through difficult times. Chen has the responsibility to live up to the public's expectations and focus on pushing ahead with effective policies that best serve the public and Taiwan's national interests.
He should remember that the public has entrusted him with a precious honor -- to go down in history as the head of the first pro-localization regime in Taiwan. The rest of his legacy is something that he has to work on now.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,