In the seas around the US island territory of Guam in the Central Pacific, a delegation of 10 Chinese army, navy and air force officers watched three US aircraft carriers and other armed forces go through strenuous training exercises last week.
At the same time in Beijing, the retired chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Richard Myers, met with General Liang Guanglie (梁光烈), chief of the general staff of the People's Liberation Army (PLA). They discussed anti-terrorism, the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and regional security, according to the official PLA Daily newspaper.
These were the latest military exchanges to which US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and PLA leaders agreed during Rumsfeld's visit to China last fall. A crucial US objective in exposing the Chinese to US military operations is to avert a Chinese miscalculation about US capabilities. These exchanges, in turn, are part of a delicate and difficult balancing act for the US in Asia, which is to keep the peace between China and Taiwan.
"We are trying our best to have both sides understand the true role we are playing," says Admiral William Fallon, who commands US forces in the Pacific and Asia from his headquarters above Pearl Harbor in Hawaii.
Fallon, the senior US military officer responsible for executing what he called a policy of "evenhandedness," said in an interview: "We want to do whatever we can to prevent the PRC [People's Republic of China] from attacking [Taiwan] militarily. On the other hand, we are trying to encourage the people of Taiwan to figure out some way in which they can reach a long-term accommodation with the PRC."
That balance has been sought since 1979, when US president Jimmy Carter switched US diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. A displeased US Congress responded by passing the Taiwan Relations Act to insist that whatever administration was in office in Washington would take Chinese threats to Taiwan seriously.
Today, the rivalry between Taiwan and China has become more intense and the US more engaged, for two reasons.
One, China has become a regional political, economic, and military power and is well on its way to becoming a global power that insists on conquering Taiwan. Second, Taiwan, after decades of authoritarian rule, has become a democracy and an economic tiger whose citizens have increasingly demanded the right to self-determination.
For the US, hostilities between China and Taiwan would almost certainly draw the US into a war that would be more destructive than the Korean war of 1950-1953, in which 54,246 Americans died and 103,284 were wounded, or the war in Vietnam from 1954 to 1972, in which 58,209 Americans died and 153,303 were wounded.
In the interview, Fallon said the US has made progress in achieving the balance.
"From my perspective," he said, "we are better off today than we were a year ago."
He said that when he visited China last month for the second time, he found "the tension levels have ameliorated over the past year. They have not ratcheted up their declarations. That's helpful because, in the absence of that tension, there are more opportunities to work things out."
About Taiwan, he cautioned, "they should not have unrealistic expectations that, no matter what they do, we are going to come to their defense should they take steps that might provoke [China]," meaning seeking formal independence.
Fallon also criticized Taiwan for not spending enough on defense or to improving its defenses.
"To their credit," he said, "they appear now to recognize this. The military people get it and have taken steps, in my view, to start addressing some of these issues."
The admiral did not mention President Chen Shui-bian (
On another front, Fallon has been the target of a whispering campaign in Washington, where so called "China hawks" such as Michael Pillsbury, who consults widely on China, and Larry Wortzel of the conservative Heritage Foundation, a retired army colonel, have complained that Fallon's plans for exchanges with China give away too much.
To that criticism, Fallon responded: "I will do the things that I believe are correct. I certainly understand the policies of the administration. I certainly understand the guidance of my boss, the secretary [of defense]."
In reply to an e-mailed query, a spokesman for Rumsfeld, Eric Ruff, pointed to Rumsfeld's agreement with Chinese leaders and said: "Admiral Fallon is following up on these."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS