The president is chosen by the people and only has to respond to public opinion. When the president is engaged in dialogue with the public, the media should stay out of the matter.
The pan-blue camp gave 10 reasons for its campaign to recall President Chen Shui-bian (
In his televised response, Chen did not sidestep any of these issues. Rather, he defended himself by using hard facts and history to show that his accusers were applying stricter standards to him than for themselves.
Chen evoked memories of the Chiang family's dictatorship, for the period was not that long ago and still torments Taiwanese. Tailor-made for the Chiang regime and amended by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Constitution is the source of the nation's chaos, he said. Using hard data and international ratings, he rebutted accusations that the nation is in an economic slump.
He responded to the allegations of corruption by reiterating that everyone is equal before the law and that crimes committed by his relatives or aides would not be covered up. Regarding the Sogo voucher scandal which has been a focus of breathless media attention but remains unsupported by fact, Chen said repeatedly that he would step down if his wife Wu Shu-jen (
Chen dealt with the routine accusations against his aides by dealing with each and every one of them individually. He said that it is difficult to prevent one's staff from slipping up or sparking controversy, but that it is unethical and unfair to say that every such incident implies administration-wide corruption.
He also said that the smear campaign against Minister of Education Tu Cheng-sheng (
In response to the accusation that Chen should be held responsible for undermining US-Taiwan relations, Chen asked the public to review the latest remarks made by American Institute in Taiwan Chairman Raymond Burghardt. He said that the true diplomatic setback occurred with Chiang Kai-shek's (
Chen stressed that Beijing constantly suppresses Taiwan on the diplomatic front, regardless of the party of Taiwanese officials. For example, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Chen can never compromise on clean governance and should candidly face any allegations and not seek to cover up any wrongdoing. He must do his level best to govern the nation, and when the nation faces difficulties, he must insist on Taiwan's view. If he does, he will enjoy public support.
Chen Gau-tzu is deputy director of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of