On Tuesday night, President Chen Shui-bian (
As expected, those who support the president cheered, while those who oppose him were unmoved and unimpressed.
Supporters of the president were encouraged by his open attitude, reassured of his integrity and gave him a thumbs-up for his speech. But those who remained unconvinced criticized Chen for his windy monologue, lack of sincerity, twisted arguments and failure to provide any concrete evidence against allegations of his wife and his son-in-law's involvement in a series of corruption scandals.
While many more might still be in the process of digesting and forming their opinion of the president's address, one thing is clear: the increasing polarization of the country's pan-green and pan-blue camps.
A recall of Chen can only be warranted if there were substantial criminal evidence linking him to any wrongdoing. That was what Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The degree to which emotions are fueling the recall motion can be seen from the fact that People First Party Chairman James Soong (
The risk is that the opposition's unreasonable and relentless attack against Chen in its effort to unseat him will arouse more negative sentiment among Chen's supporters. And as pan-green supporters' anger toward pan-blue politicians' tactics gather strength and they start venting their discontent in public, this would in return generate more heat from the pan-blue crowd.
Chen should have realized by now that to some people, no matter how much he tries, his efforts will never be good enough.
For it is sad but true that to some people in this country, there can always be fault found in whatever Chen does, simply because what Chen represents is anathema to fixations on Greater China.
The double standards that the pro-China media apply to Chen were evident when he was severely criticized for giving his son a glamorous wedding -- the very same media had only words of praise when KMT Legislator Lin Yi-shih (
When the opposition bashes Chen, the pro-China media chimes in with charges of incompetence. But when Chen went on the offensive, pro-China political commentators turned around and demanded that he -- as head of state -- should show more tolerance for others and allow more room for criticism.
Either way, Chen just can't win, and national stability is being jeopardized by all of this incessant political wrangling.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS