The recent controversy over whether two talk show hosts of the cable station TVBS -- Lee Tao (李濤) and his wife, Lee Yen-chiu (李豔秋) -- provided an opposition lawmaker with information that formed the basis of allegations of first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) accepting a large amount of vouchers from Sogo Department Store has sparked a debate on the role of the media in Taiwan's politically divided society.
The truth has yet to be revealed, but the issue highlights an even more serious problem that necessitates a careful study. Lee Tao's talk show, 2100 Quan Min Kai Jiang (2100
The show's disclosure of former DPP deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan's (
However, the way Lee and his so-called coterie of "famous speakers" have conducted themselves throughout this affair shows a shameless lack of journalistic ethics and professionalism that poses a danger to the nation's democracy because of the implied negative connection between politicians and media personnel.
In today's atmosphere of 24-hour news and instant information, where public opinion can change in a flash and missteps are magnified on a grand scale, the role of the press should not only be that of a fact-describer but also a valuable educator.
Regretfully, the changes in domestic politics over the last two decades, as well as the liberalization of the media industry, have given birth to intense competition and a lowering of the quality of Taiwanese media. With the way things are often politicized in the country, the media has gradually lost its focus.
Aside from the lack of professionalism, there has been an overemphasis on trivial or sensational inside stories. When the media gradually loses its self-discipline, it becomes a tool for politicians and people with vested interests.
Many believe in the power of the press. This conviction that the media is a powerful tool for swaying voters is what drives some news editors, reporters and call-in show hosts to exaggerate and even make up news stories. The principle of verifying the sources of news has in many cases become nothing but empty talk.
Because of this biased media culture, many have fallen into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. And the result is that the credibility of both the politicians and the media are downgraded. Lee and his talk show are the typical products of the nation's unique and unhealthy politics.
Even the attempts to institutionalize media structure has been tainted by political interference. The establishment of the National Communications Commission as an independent mechanism to examine media operations became an arena for political wrangling last year. The pan-blue camp's nominees secured a majority in the commission, which has sabotaged the credibility of the commission.
Despite all these manipulations, the public will one day wake up to the truth. When the public finally sees the true picture -- as what has happened with some of the allegations relating to the Sogo voucher case -- these political maneuverings and tactics can backfire.
Indeed, there has been a number of complaints from the people on these news reports and shows, which goes to show that in the end it is the public who decides independently of the media. People will pay attention to what they want to, regardless of what the media think is important. The public knows best.
More and more public polls now show that people have become greatly suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in spotting its attempts at manipulation.
The public now sees the media as a kind of special interest group, no more objective than or independent of any other social groups in presenting its view.
Perhaps this is the only constructive way to strengthen media discipline and professionalism. Institutional reform is not perfect and often is only the first step to provide a fair competition environment for the media. Public monitoring constitutes the key to mature media competition and a well-implemented social responsibility of the media.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS