It's about time that the pan-blue camp realized what damage it is doing to Taiwan and put an end to its ridiculous efforts to recall the president.
Its attempts to spark a Philippines-style "people power" movement and oust the president have so far failed miserably, with only diehard pan-blue fans answering the call to take to the streets.
Maybe this has something to do with the fact that the Taiwanese electorate was not surprised to find out that some politicians, their aides and relatives may have been abusing their positions to fill their own pockets. If they were concerned about such things then why would the people of Taitung and Taichung counties regularly elect people like Wu Chun-li (
Or could it be the fact that People First Party Chairman James Soong (
It is patently obvious to anyone with an iota of political knowledge that the real reason for Soong's leading role is because he is trying to rescue his flagging career and bolster his popularity for a crack at the Taipei mayorship. Since Ma Ying-jeou (
Of course the president's inner circle and his family should be punished if they are found guilty of corruption. But they should not be subject to "trial by TVBS" or any other kind of PFP or KMT-led kangaroo court. The nation's investigators should be allowed the time and space they need to get on with their job.
We have already seen what a one-sided legislative probe can produce with the 319 shooting special truth investigation committee: a lot of hot air, speculation and absolutely no concrete proof.
But the saddest thing about this whole recall affair is that it has cruelly exposed Ma's weak position. Many fence-sitting Taiwanese must have had high hopes for Ma and the KMT after he swept to the chairmanship last year on promises of clean politics and party reform.
And many of them may have believed that he had miraculously transformed the KMT from a super-rich party of vote-buyers and career carpetbaggers into an ultra-clean party of paupers.
When plans for a recall bid first appeared, Ma was the voice of reason, in contrast to other pan-blue figures screaming for the head of Chen Shui-bian (
By letting himself be press-ganged into supporting the recall bid, Ma has shown that the same deep-blue elements that cannot stand to see Taiwan ruled by a pro-localization regime still hold the KMT's reins of power. It has become increasingly clear that they will stop at nothing in their bid to oust the president, even if it means creating more division in Taiwan's already deeply-split society.
The high threshold required to recall the president means that their bid has been doomed from the start, and the pan-blue camp is well aware of this. They have only further demonstrated to the general public what a bitter, hateful bunch they really are.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS