When I read the newspaper on June 6, I saw Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) picture, with Ma saying, "If President Chen doesn't resign now, he will die terribly."
How frightening Ma's face was! How cruel his words are!
The problem, of course, is President Chen Shui-bian's (
But even if President Chen is guilty and used his privileged position and information to play games on the stock market, his crime is not serious enough to be given the death penalty. Ma has an influential position as leader of the KMT. How can the leader of an important party say such unreasonable and cruel words?
Does Ma want to stir up a war between political groups?
Taiwan has already become a democracy. If any president is proven guilty of serious corruption by the courts, then he will be forced to step down from his post.
As a matter of fact, Ma is almost sure to be president of Taiwan in 2008. Why does he want to take over the regime in such a hurry? Does he want to cause more chaos in Taiwan?
Why doesn't he act and speak more reasonably?
I don't know why he has changed so much. In the past he came across as such a fine, reasonable and moderate man.
Nothing can be proven by the people. Nothing can be settled by a war of words in the media.
Everyone should just calm down and let the courts deal with it. This is the appropriate way to handle the situation.
Chaos and conflict on the streets can easily turn into a bloody revolution with many people being sacrificed.
It is well known that the members of the KMT are much more corrupt than those of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but the KMT never think they are wrong. Certainly some members of the DPP are corrupt, although much less so than the KMT. But while the KMT is easily forgiven, the DPP is easily tainted. A corrupt KMT is laughing and throwing stones at a less corrupt DPP. Is this fair?
If the KMT and People First Party (PFP) insist on the recall of President Chen before the justice system proves that he is involved in any corruption, society will be divided in half and a potentially violent conflict will be hard to avoid.
Such a conflict could easily last until 2008. In that case, the whole nation will experience great trouble. The government won't be able to do anything during this period, and we will go nowhere for two long years.
The price the nation will pay for this detour will be high.
If President Chen is really involved in corruption, there is no need for the pan-blues to demand his recall -- the pan-greens will dispose of him themselves.
There is little doubt that Ma is going to be president of Taiwan in less than two years. Why can't he just wait, and let the nation avoid a terrible political calamity? So I plead with all the people in Taiwan to calm down. Let's wait and see what the court decides.
Peter Wang
Tainan City
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused