Not long ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Who would have thought that we would see Ma working hard to boost his political status through the Taiwanese media, and that he would be doing so in such a vicious manner?
On June 1, Ma said that the plan to recall Chen had not yet been finalized, but on June 2, he changed his tune. He then said that, "The gun is loaded and trained on the target, the only question remaining is when to pull the trigger."
On June 5, he said at an question-and-answer session in the Taipei City Council: "You haven't seen my bad side yet. Just you wait!"
And then, on June 7, he said that if Chen did not step down voluntarily and had to be pushed down, "He will die a nasty death."
Ma, who all along has stressed reason and the rule of law, in the end resorted to the language of violence and bloodshed and inciting hatred.
Not paying any attention to the great and small disasters resulting from the last two weeks of torrential rains or the victims of these disasters, Ma then prepared to travel to southern Taiwan on June 10 to join People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) in Taipei in "a two-pronged attack" on Chen, who was then inspecting the disaster areas.
It was only the heavy rains on the morning of June 10 that stopped Ma from traveling south, but instead he joined Soong on Ketagelan Boulevard.
While Premier Su Tseng-chang (
At the ongoing extraordinary legislative session, the KMT continues to insist on discussing the presidential recall motion while suppressing discussion about the budget for the required flood prevention measures. This only shows that the old leaders now holding power in the KMT and the PFP only care about winning back their own power and benefits, while they ignore the general public's hardship.
This has caused unhappiness among some pan-blue camp legislators. In asking Chen to work on the economy while he himself works for his own political gain, Ma is taking his cue from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The CCP wants the Chinese people to think about money and the economy while the party maintains its hold on political power. As a result, the benefits enjoyed by the people concentrating on the economy fall far behind the benefits of those with their hands on political power.
Beijing also wants Hong Kong to concentrate on developing its economy, because the CCP does not want Hong Kong residents to fight for democracy and become their own masters.
In the same way, Ma wants Chen to work to improve the economy so that the KMT can get its hands on power, once again monopolize the nation's resources and sell Taiwan out to China, the eventual target of Ma's policies.
While others work to improve the economy at Ma's request, he will take the opportunity to fill the political vacuum they leave behind.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has not done enough politically -- going on the campaign trail is only one small part of politics -- and it has become corrupted by power because it has not held up its guard.
Nor has it been active enough in its attempts to eliminate black gold, and it has been unable to defend itself against other people's hidden agendas.
The DPP has furthermore failed to understand how to handle crises, and has continued doing dumb things. Its desinicization attempts have not been well implemented, and following the stereotypical view of Chinese people, the DPP like to engage in internal bickering.
All these things have prevented the party from laying the recent corruption scandals to rest. Incited by Ma and Soong, it is not very strange that the pan-blue demonstration on Ketagelan Boulevard on June 10 led to violence.
The Taiwanese people must be on their guard to not walk into the trap Ma is setting for them.
Pan-blue violence and provocation must be met with reason and a cool hand to prevent the opposition from bringing Taiwan to the verge of chaos and calling on China to come to their aid.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS