There are two ways to interpret Latin America's recent election results.
First and most obviously, the supposed turn to the left is running out of steam, fast. In recent weeks, the hyper-nationalist Ollanta Humala, a clone of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, was defeated in Peru, the conservative Alvaro Uribe won a landslide victory in Colombia, with 62 percent of the vote and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has fallen behind in the campaign for Mexico's July 2 presidential election. All of these isolated developments seemingly contradict the leftward trend in Latin America.
But there is another way of looking at these events. Yes, President Uribe won re-election, but the big surprise in Colombia was the end of the two-party system that had dominated the country for decades and the emergence of the left-wing Polo Democratico as the second largest political force in the nation.
Similarly, while Alan Garcia won in Peru, he does not come from a hard-left party that has finally seen the light -- like Lula da Silva in Brazil, Michelle Bachelet in Chile and Tabare Vazquez in Uruguay. His APRA party, founded by Victor Raul Haya de la Torre in the 1920s, is one of the region's oldest and most anachronistic populist organizations.
Like Chavez in Venezuela, Kirchner in Argentina, Evo Morales in Bolivia and Lopez Obrador in Mexico, President Garcia belongs to the unreconstructed left that springs from the great Latin American populist tradition. He may have learned many lessons from his disastrous presidency in the 1980s, but he is much closer to the wrong left than to the right one. In Mexico, Lopez Obrador has both begun picking up in the polls in recent days and showing his true colors, promising the stars and the moon to the Mexican electorate.
In fact, the more important recent developments within the Latin American left may lie not so much in the horse race results of elections, but in the growing differences between modernists and revanchists, between national interests and ideology. As Morales cozies up to Chavez and Fidel Castro more quickly than most people expected -- nationalizing Bolivia's natural gas, inviting large numbers of Cuban doctors and advisers to his country and signing myriad cooperation agreements with Venezuela -- he is also fueling increasing tensions with Brazil and Chile.
Both countries are his neighbors and, in theory at least, their leaders are his ideological soul mates. But the differences between the modern and archaic left and the three countries' contradictory national interests, seem to be trumping more superficial political affinities.
For example, Sao Paulo, Brazil's industrial powerhouse, now depends for most of its energy on Bolivian natural gas. As a result, Petrobras, the Brazilian energy company, has invested huge sums in Bolivia in everything from exploration to pipelines. Now, with the election of Evo Morales, the main source of Petrobras' natural gas has suddenly been nationalized.
Indeed, domestic royalties on Bolivian gas production are being increased by more than 50 percent and the price charged to Bolivia's foreign clients may well be doubled. Contracts are being respected only in the breach and technicians and lawyers from PDVESA, the Venezuelan oil giant, are auditing Petrobras installations in Bolivia. Lula wants to be nice to Morales, but he can't be nice to his expropriating neighbor and at the same time keep the industrialists and consumers of Sao Paulo happy.
Similar frictions are arising with Chile. President Bachelet would like to solve the century-old problem of landlocked Bolivia's access to the Pacific, but is finding this task to be trickier than expected, as Morales increases gas prices and reduces gas exports to Argentina, Chile's largest foreign supplier of energy. Nor does Morales' rhetoric help: accusing the US of attempting to assassinate him, as he did last week, does not endear him to the elites of a country that has signed a free-trade agreement with the US and whose president will be visiting Washington soon.
At the end of the day, Bolivia's immediate national interests may be served by Morales' strategic alliance with Cuba and Venezuela. On the other hand, Chavez's unabashed meddling in the Peruvian elections may have so alienated Alan Garcia that he actually becomes a European-style social democrat and Lopez Obrador may deliver on his promises to respect NAFTA, adhere to macro-economic orthodoxy and pursue good relations with the US.
But the cleavage between the two lefts in Latin American is steadily deepening. This is inevitable, because that rupture is being fueled by the simple acknowledgement that responsible governments must place national interests ahead of nostalgia, grandstanding rhetoric and strident ideology.
Jorge Castaneda, former foreign minister of Mexico, is a distinguished professor of politics and Latin American studies at New York University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s