The protests following the attempted assassination on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) on March 19, 2004, sparked fears that the country would descend into chaos, leaving Taiwan especially vulnerable to an attack by China. The present political crisis surrounding Chen's son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (趙建銘) recalls the pandemonium following the March 19 shooting incident -- Taiwan once again has slipped into a political firestorm that endangers the nation.
The Chao-related scandals are unsettling, and a restoration order is necessary to reassure the public and save Taiwan. However, society should be warned that a fair and balanced approach to Chao's case is also necessary amid the current political crisis.
If the China Times, United Daily News and other pro-unification media outlets had reported on scandals involving fugitive tycoon Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪) and fugitive ex-legislative speaker Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩) with the same level of righteousness and attention to detail as they have with Chao's case, then the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would have been brought to its knees.
Chen Yu-hao fled Taiwan after defaulting on a NT$50 billion (US$1.5 million) loan; Liu, a former People First Party legislator and legislative speaker, fled Taiwan after being sentenced to four years in prison for accepting kickbacks worth NT$150 million. The vastly different manner in which the pan-blue media frame scandals reveals their lack of professionalism. Yes, there is no denying that Chao's case has scarred Taiwan. However, we must appeal to the public to be aware that some of Taiwan's media are extremely biased.
When and where Chao and his associates met, what they discussed and other details of his rendezvous with various captains of commerce are under intense scrutiny. Common sense tells us that such details are beyond the collective capabilities of one or a few private investigation firms.
If the formidable surveillance capabilities of the KMT apparatus were turned loose on not only the pan-greens but also itself, Taiwan's political landscape would look a lot different.
Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tse (李遠哲) said: "A lot of businesspeople have told me that [corrupt] Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) members come cheap because they don't know the market."
Chao's case is merely the tip of the iceberg; Taiwanese politics is home to plenty of much darker secrets. The scandals involving Chao should not completely distract us from the big picture.
The single greatest issue that has the greatest impact on the well-being of the Taiwanese people is whether the country is being gradually devoured and assimilated by China.
With this fact in mind we can can better appreciate President Chen's efforts in defending Taiwan's sovereignty, the choice of Tu Cheng-sheng (
Presently, the pan-blues are stirring up a movement to unseat the president. The pan-greens, on the other hand, are being reported on in a selective, biased manner, which is fanning anti-Chen sentiment. With the long-term interests of the Taiwanese people at heart, we call on the media to not pull down our struggling helmsman -- who has not been accused or found guilty of any wrongdoing -- as he navigates us through dangerous waters; and let the wise, objective thinkers among us forge a greater Taiwan.
Signed by 28 Taiwanese professors and media professionals.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with