So President Chen Shui-bian (
There are those within the pan-green camp who might be happy at the prospect of Premier Su Tseng-chang (
But the president's decision poses dangers for Su. After all, it is unlikely the move will defuse any of the scandals plaguing the administration. The insider-trading scandal that has ensnared Chen's son-in-law reflects on the first family's honor and integrity.
As Presidential Office Spokesman David Lee (
The stain of corruption has tainted Chen. Even if he is completely honest, he has surrounded himself with the crooked and the corrupt -- and in the case of former top adviser Chen Che-nan (
And this is what brings us back to Su. The premier faces a number of difficulties as he tries to balance his responsibilities as the nation's chief executive with the need to distance himself from Chen.
The basic problem is that, regardless of what happens to Chen, Su is going to be left with the unenviable task of cleaning up the mess. It is Su that must deal with the aftermath of the various scandals that have erupted. It is Su who will have to take the flak for the landslides, floods, typhoons, crop damage, financial problems and myriad other issues that a premier has to deal with each year.
Contrast this with Ma, who has no national responsibilities. As Taipei mayor, he is responsible for the most developed and wealthiest part of the nation, which may have periodic problems, but obviously not on the scale of the rest of the country. So Ma isn't likely to have to make many decisions of national import. He will appeal to voters because all he has to do is sit on the sidelines and snipe at the administration with carefully crafted press releases.
But Su is in the trenches. He has to get himself down in the dirt of the day-to-day operations of the government. Su will have to demonstrate whether or not he has the ability to lead this nation long before he ever has a chance to run for head of state.
One suspects that Ma isn't being entirely sincere when he implies Chen should step down. He must be satisfied with things as they are now: The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration is in disarray, beset by scandal and unable to find its direction. His most likely rival for the presidency is at the mercy of forces beyond his control, and Ma will have ample opportunities to let his henchmen knock the premier down a notch or two whenever a problem erupts.
Of course, what is best for Ma is not necessarily best for the country. The people should ask themselves why it is that Su is where he is now. They should ask themselves if they would prefer a leader who is unafraid to risk his political capital simply to get things done, as is Su, or one who calculates from the shadows and takes advantage of others' mistakes, as does Ma.
If Taiwan chooses the spider, it shouldn't cry when it gets bitten.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS