As prosecutors worked diligently to investigate the insider-trading allegations against President Chen Shui-bian's (
Without any question, as the leader of this country, Chen should be judged in accordance with the highest ethical standards. Therefore, no one doubts that he should shoulder some degree of moral responsibility for the behavior of his family members. It is also true that no amount of apologizing from the president is enough to make up for the behavior of his family members, which if not illegal is at least immoral -- depending on the findings of the prosecutors.
However, to call for the resignation or even the recall of the president at this point is completely preposterous. From a legal standpoint, Chao has not even been formally prosecuted, let alone convicted. Even if Chao is found guilty, so far no evidence suggests that the president was even aware of what Chao is reputed to have done. Based on the facts that have come to light so far, the course of action suggested by Soong is unthinkable.
From a pragmatic standpoint, moving to recall the president now will do far more harm than good. Despite the overwhelming disapproval and even outrage over the series of scandals exposed recently, society remains relatively stable and orderly. If the president steps down abruptly, the resulting social unrest and political chaos would pose much risk for the nation.
There are less than two years left before the next presidential election. Voters have been keeping score on the performance and behavior of all political parties and politicians. The performance of Chen and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has not lived up to expectations, especially on domestic issues. The pan-blue camp has performed badly in many ways as well. Let the voters decide who they want in power through the ballot box.
It is especially noteworthy that despite the irreparable injuries inflicted upon the president's credibility and reputation, Taiwan's democracy has matured to the point that all organs of the government have continued to operate and function smoothly and independently. The most important case in point is of course the fact that Chao has been taken into custody by the prosecutors office pending a criminal investigation.
The attitude of President Chen so far, while far from sufficient to earn the forgiveness of the general public for Chao's behavior, has minimized the impact on the government caused by the investigation. He has continued to perform his regular official duties and has also asked for prosecutors and the judiciary to uphold the law.
Under the circumstances, unless the president is discovered to have had any role in the scandal, it just does not make sense to end Chen's presidency prematurely, instead of waiting for a peaceful and smooth handover of power at the next presidential election.
One can only speculate about Soong's incentive for raising such a proposal. It has been suggested that he may be trying to score brownie points for the upcoming Taipei mayoral election. If that is the case, his action is short-sighted and self-centered.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS