In spite of any friction between Taiwan and the US caused by the US during President Chen Shui-bian's (
The first is the US announcement that it seeks to normalize diplomatic relations with Libya. Although Chen's recent visit to Libya was a diplomatic breakthrough, pro-China forces slammed the visit as an attempt to consort with a rogue nation in definance of the US. On May 15, three days after Chen had returned to Taiwan, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced that the US and Libya would renew full diplomatic ties, and that the US would remove Libya from its list of state sponsors of terrorism.
The announcement no doubt embarrassed pro-China forces in Taiwan. They had just finished extolling the importance of the US-Taiwan relationship and criticizing Chen; their true colors would have been revealed if they were to suddenly shift gears and adopt an anti-US stance to keep the heat on Chen. However, being China-friendly, their true nature is to oppose the US -- drumming up US-Taiwan relations at the time was merely part of a strategy to undermine Taiwan.
Libya's interaction with democratic Taiwan is beneficial to the former's image, and will promote improvements in Libya's behavior. This is something that the US looks forward to, especially as North Korea and Iran, with China's support, continue to lock horns with the US. Resuming diplomatic ties with Libya after a quarter century of enmity is a constructive development in the US effort to forge a united front against terrorism. Muammar Qaddafi's comments regarding China's oppression of Taiwan during his meeting with Chen, were especially moving. Such boldness and support is rare.
Before all this, US President George W. Bush met Chinese human rights advocates Yu Jie (余杰), Wang Yi (王怡) and Li Boguang (李柏光) at the White House on April 11. The meeting, which was extended to an hour from the originally scheduled half-hour, took place in a residential room, and was very cordial and warm. The human rights advocates discussed with Bush problems pertaining to religion in China and their own families' situations there. Afterwards, they even prayed together.
Although the meeting was nominally focused on the topic of human rights in China, it had more to do with religion which is an important aspect of human rights. The meeting's intense focus on religion became especially controversial when a non-Christian member of the human rights coterie did not attend the meeting, sparking speculation among dissidents. China capitalized on the buzz to advance its divide-and-conquer strategy.
In the past, US presidents have met with exiled proponents of democracy. Nowadays, not only has the president met with dissidents from China, but their topic of discussion has often been religion, indicating that the US hopes that freedom of religion can be the starting point in promoting democracy in China. The inclusiveness of religion can solve the disputes within China's democratic movement.
The democratization of China in turn could generate a resolution to the Taiwan problem. However, recent disputes among Chinese democratic proponents reveal just how complex the dynamics of the Chinese democratic movement are. It is hoped that such proponents will come to appreciate the greater cause and set aside their disputes.
Religious freedom thrives in Taiwan, and the country needs to capitalize on this to promote democratic reform in China, and to confront that nation's united front tactics.
Paul Lin is a New York-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS