Robert Ross wrote an article titled "Taiwan's Fading Independence Movement," (Foreign Affairs, Volume 85, No. 2) to purportedly toll the final bell for Taiwan's independence supporters and usher in the new era of a pro-unification Taiwan.
Addressing the Taiwan independence movement with a severely jaundiced view, the article exemplifies a growing misconception among international commentators that equates the popularity of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) with the Taiwanese people's pro-unification sentiment.
Added to this is the mirror-image trend of their equating the popularity of President Chen Shui-bian (
This assertion has been largely dismantled by Ma's recent comments, which have caused great consternation among his deep-blue constituents. Ma conceded the possibility that the Taiwanese people might eventually want to choose formal independence for Taiwan. Ma's move immediately after that to reaffirm the KMT's avowed ultimate goal of unification muddled his message, but did nothing to alter the fact that Ma's popularity and public pro-unification sentiment in Taiwan do not go hand-in-hand.
But international expectations could crescendo around the time of Ma's presumed inauguration as president in 2008 to a point where violent turmoil in Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait might be unavoidable.
The problem stems from the strong probability that heightened international expectations at that time could exert formidable pressure on Beijing to force a quick merger between Taiwan and China -- regardless of whether Taiwan is ready -- to save face for Beijing. This underscores the inescapable perils of a Ma presidency, should he continue to equivocate.
Ma's difficulties begin with the fact that his popularity is based on false pretenses. His supporters believe that he can best deal with Beijing to improve Taiwan's economy, in addition to maintaining Taiwan's status as a de facto independent and sovereign country, whose eventual status will be determined by the 23 million people of Taiwan in the distant future. These beliefs will be immediately and severely tested the moment Ma comes into contact with Beijing in his capacity as president of Taiwan.
Any of his defiance to Bei-jing in the context of Taiwan's status as a de facto sovereign entity -- for instance, his rejection of a "unification timetable" or reluctance to outlaw Taiwan's independence movement -- would quickly bring catastrophe to the Taiwanese people. That's because "losing face" internationally bodes ill for the survival of Beijing's regime, given the hyped up international expectations.
Therefore it is imperative that Ma clarify unequivocally to the Taiwanese people that his future engagement with Beijing would entail relinquishing Taiwan's sovereignty and outlawing Taiwan's independence movement. He should also admit that he would have little control over a "unification timetable" and that all his talk regarding the options for the Taiwanese people would eventually come to nought. This would minimize the potential for internal strife if he were elected as Taiwan's president.
Given Ma and the KMT's desperate ambition to regain power in Taiwan, Beijing will be intentionally wasting an opportunity to resolve cross-strait tensions if it continues to shun the Chen administration in the next two years. This would be even more regrettable now that the Chen administration has regained some political footing by scrapping the National Unification Council and its guidelines.
But apparently bent on waiting out Chen, Beijing is busy getting international voices to echo its claim on Taiwan. Beijing even complained about Chen's behavior to the UN, marking the first time Beijing brought cross-Taiwan Strait issues to the international body. Previously, China always told the international community that cross-strait relations were a purely domestic problem.
But rather than nudging Taiwan under Chen any closer into Beijing's grip, these maneuvers may have inadvertently succeeded in putting pressure on Beijing to force the Taiwan issue if Ma become the next Taiwanese president.
Only the Taiwanese voters can stop this mad race to rain disaster on Taiwan. The Taiwanese people's fate is in their own hands.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even