Isn't it intriguing that a political party such as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would hold a demonstration to appeal to people and the Taiwanese government to focus their efforts on the economy rather than on politics?
In the martial law era, the KMT monopolized Taiwan's politics by enforcing its White Terror rule. Now, after polarizing Taiwan's politics since the transfer of power in 2000, it wants to shed its image as a political spoiler. This time, it wants the nation and its people to focus on the economy -- and leave politics to China and the KMT.
This is a deception. KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has vigorously talked about unification and cross-strait issues for the last couple of months. Unable to clarify his stance on the issues and make a sale, he has now retreated to asking people to stop the unification-independence quarrel and direct their efforts to economic improvement. That's something he's excelled at since selling billions of dollars of the KMT's ill-gotten assets.
Things like cross-strait relations, the economy and diplomacy all need to be heeded by Taiwan. Politicians and people should be encouraged to debate the issues fully and solve the issues according to their priorities, rather than retreat and seek a refuge.
The "status quo" is a temporary refuge for people who won't face a tough situation. This is an irresponsible approach for a sensible person, especially when a delay may aggravate the situation.
These days Ma, as KMT chairman, is back to playing the trick he does best: Being a darling of females. He portrayed himself as the Goddess Diana on a KMT Web site and tried to woo votes from women in Taiwan through such "soft" packaging.
Image is everything. Ma's deeds and words are nothing but politics. Groomed by a brutal, ruthless Leninist party, Ma is quite different from his predecessors. His gentle and soft pitch may win him many women's votes. But is that enough for a party that has never repented or been held accountable to win its 2008 presidential bid?
This is a serious question for all Taiwanese.
Yang Ji-charng
Ohio
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers