This year's US State Department country report on human rights in Taiwan is, as always, very welcome. The good news first: In the last year, there was no arbitrary or unlawful killing, no politically motivated disappearances, no political prisoners, no government restrictions on the Internet, no government interference with academic work, no anti-Semitic acts or any other ethnic or religious conflict of note. There was freedom to conduct religious affairs, free and fair elections and a free media (so free that individual privacy continued to be violated by gormless camera crews).
The report made no mention, however, of the falling number of executions, nor the failure of the Chen administration to eradicate the death penalty entirely. By world standards, however, this is hardly a dramatic development.
But there is bad news, too.
Judicial corruption -- particularly the antics of bad-apple prosecutors and judges -- stands out, pointing to a legal system in need of serious review.
More worrying for the average person is the problem posed by police corruption. To this, locals would also add conspicuous police ineptitude and indifference, problems that will require steady changes in police culture to overcome. It is clear to those who must deal with the police that in practice the concept of due process remains nebulous, which of course can result in considerable convenience at times, but at other times the potential for gross violation of basic legal entitlements is stark.
The report cited the Control Yuan as playing a key role in looking into many of these problems, though it strangely did not mention that the pan-blue camp has frozen this watchdog arm of government.
An increase in violence against women and children is very disturbing, as is the claim that child prostitution (defined as under the age of 18) is continuing, especially involving Aboriginal children.
Trafficking of women, largely Chinese, for sexual exploitation and forced labor was also given close attention in the report, as was the scandalously light punishment meted out to brokers and families who exploit and even enslave domestic workers from Southeast Asia.
Not unfairly, the Council of Labor Affairs was painted in a poor light for presiding over a system that effectively seeds the exploitation of foreign workers.
Overall, however, the government can find comfort in a positive assessment of its efforts to maintain and improve the human rights environment.
The State Department's report is of considerable value because it speaks authoritatively about Taiwan while standing outside the partisan muddying that can overwhelm local human rights discourse. Indeed, compared with the lack of enthusiasm that many in the State Department feel toward Taiwan in general, the report is like a bouquet: It embraces Taiwanese and foreigners here as human beings worthy of respect and protection. And because politicians on both sides are loath to openly denigrate the US for daring to pass judgement on their country (a comparison with China on this point is irresistible), the report obtains an unusual credibility.
Comparisons with China's dire human rights environment, while tempting, are irrelevant. Taiwan must set its own standard for the protection and promotion of human rights and seek to reach that standard.
Human rights are not simply the pet project of a middle class with too much time on its hands; they are a lattice of litmus tests of how well a government and a society function in relation to the law and the extent to which common decency extends throughout the community. It is hoped that the measured criticisms in this report can energize those who aim to craft a more stable, just and dignified nation.
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS