China's annual National People's Congress (NPC) inevitably brings with it an absurd escalation of cross-strait tension. The cause lies in the fact that this so-called "highest representative body," which has never been subject to popular elections, simply serves to rubber stamp the inflammatory policies of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Lately, it has also been serving to distract as many people as possible from the escalation of rural anger at corruption and land theft by invoking that most convenient of chestnuts: Taiwanese "splittism."
It is hilarious to witness Premier Wen Jiabao (
What does Beijing mean when it talks of "the will of the people" and "international trends"? After all, it has never held national elections or referendums, so what is the basis of such statements? Its repeated and recycled condemnation of the Taiwanese government invites scorn.
Communist regimes are notorious for violating the law and fabricating public opinion. This is why such regimes have been rejected all around the world. We can see that it is the overthrow of communist regimes that tallies with the wishes of most people and international trends. Absurd statements about the will of the people by Chinese officials merely serve to underline their shortcomings.
NPC toadying also serves as a mirror for the activities of the pan-blue camp. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party have repeatedly stated that they will hold demonstrations against the abolition of the NUC, and have distorted the significance of this action, stating that it is an attempt by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government to achieve de jure independence. This statement belittles the fact that it is only Taiwanese who have the right to determine their political future. Indifferent to public sentiment, the pan-blue camp remind the skeptical of its authoritarian nature.
The NUC is indeed an absurd product of an absurd era, for it upholds the idea of "China united under the Three Principles of the People," which had currency during KMT rule. Now, with the demise of the Chiang family dictatorship, the idea of retaking China has become something of a joke, for Taiwanese are perfectly clear about the fact that unification with China implies one thing only: subjugation.
Yet the pan-blue camp continues to pursue the interests of a minority and tries to force the idea of unification with China down the throats of a majority that is clearly suspicious of it.
The only consistent position for a democratic society to hold is rejecting the sham words of a sham congress, as well as those of their local soulmates.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS