Long before President Chen Shui-bian (
Just as soon as Chen announced that the council had officially "ceased to function" and the guidelines "ceased to apply," KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Given the high vote threshold required to recall a president, and Ma's admission that the motion is unlikely to be approved by the necessary two-thirds of the legislature, why all the fuss?
Ma said the KMT needs to express its condemnation of Chen, regardless of the likelihood of a recall motion being passed.
Yet one can't help but wonder if Ma is acting as China's footsoldier, or simply showing off in a bid to please Beijing, just as he did a while back when he said he hoped the KMT Youth Corp would one day produce a leader like Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Just think how delightful it must be to Hu to know that the leader of this nation's largest opposition party sees him as a role model -- and to see how fast Ma is willing to jump into a brawl with Chen, whom Chinese leaders rank right up there with former president Lee Teng-hui (
In a recent interview with Newsweek magazine, one of Ma's more predictable statements was that unification with China is the ultimate goal of the KMT.
One wonders if Ma hesitated even for a moment to think about the impact his words would have on the nation's military. In view of China's more than 700 missiles targeted at Taiwan, how can the nation's service members build up their consciousness that China is the biggest threat to Taiwan's national security when they know that this country's main opposition leader wishes to unite with China some day?
In a recent interview on the BBC's Hardtalk program, host Stephen Sackur noted that China had deployed more than 700 missiles at Taiwan, and Ma replied: "Yes, and not just Taiwan, but other places too."
Yet Ma has not been heard to protest the growing number of missiles: Perhaps he feels Taiwan shouldn't fear China's military deployment because it is part of China.
Given that Ma has long been regarded as the KMT's most likely contender for the 2008 presidential election and possible future leader of this country, one only hopes that he realizes that his every statement and deed is being closely watched and analyzed by the public, Taiwan's allies and other international observers.
He has yet to demonstrate a firm willingness to stand up for Taiwan's interests or strong ability to lead. His performances this week are unlikely to convince his critics of otherwise.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS