Starting at noon today there will be a special procession of people holding chrysanthemums in the streets around central Taipei to remember the victims of the 228 Incident. Similar processions will be held in other cities and counties nationwide. These are intended to express the profound sentiment felt by the public for those who perished. The lessons that can be learned from this terrible time have to be passed on.
The end of World War II meant that the people of Taiwan were finally free from half a century of Japanese colonialist rule. The US handed responsibility for the protection of the island over to the Nationalist government of Chiang Kai-shek (
But not even two years had elapsed before this administration dispatched a military force to engage in a campaign of indiscriminate, then calculated, slaughter. The Nationalist troops set about systematically eliminating the local elite. Thousands of respected Taiwanese met their end over this period. Many of their bodies were never found.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government used savage terror tactics to consolidate its power for five decades. No one dared to openly discuss the 228 Incident until the late 1980s. The government didn't hold an official inquiry into the incident until former president Lee Teng-hui (
However, the government has consistently failed to come clean about who ordered the slaughter and who the butchers were who carried out these acts with such impunity.
Last week Academia Historica President Chang Yen-hsien (
However, this report has no legal standing. It is not an official report and the government has not sought to have its findings confirmed by legal proceedings or by an official investigation committee. So the victims may have been identified, but the perpetrators have not been held to account.
What have we learned from this incident? Lin I-hsiung (
Faced with volatile cross-strait relations, many Taiwanese argue this nation depends on China to thrive. They are apparently able to delude themselves that despite Beijing's despotic and bloody record, it is able and willing to respect the principles of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.
The Taiwanese have already suffered tremendously as a result of such misconceptions. While commemorating the 228 victims, we must seek to ensure that we shall never suffer another similar tragedy and educate those who are disdainful or ignorant of history, particularly our legislators.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS