The Recent suggestion by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) that the time has come to seriously consider scrapping the National Unification Council and the Guidelines for National Unification has resulted in a fierce struggle between the two ends of the political spectrum.
Should the council and the guidelines be abolished? Yes, of course. The reason for this is that both the council and the guidelines aim to achieve a purpose -- eventual cross-strait "unification" -- that does not enjoy the support of the general public. Only those who favor unification with China would support retaining the council and the guidelines.
The purpose of this article is to warn the public of the danger posed by the Guidelines for National Unification, and to alert them to the existence of a second, "economic version" of these guidelines, which also needs to be abolished.
On Oct. 20, 2001, the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) National Congress passed a resolution on reorienting Taiwan's economic development. This incorporated the Economic Development Advisory Committee's (EDAC) "active opening, effective management" proposal.
This resolution has effectively become the DPP's party platform, and the government's administrative guidelines.
Although it does not specify issues of cross-strait economic integration, coexistence, or even future cross-strait unification, the content of the resolution more or less conforms with China's grand strategy of "promoting unification through economics."
As such, this policy effectively contributes to China's economic success -- at Taiwan's expense.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
When Chen put forward the revised "active management, effective opening" proposal in his New Year address, questions were raised as to whether this violated the guidelines.
But, in fact, the council and the guidelines are products of the then KMT government's one-party state, and do not serve the needs of the public. That Ma tried to use these illegitimate fabrications to defend his party's stance on cross-strait relations should serve to inspire all who love Taiwan to seek the immediate abolishment of the Guidelines for National Unification.
By the same token, the 2001 EDAC resolution was a collaborative "masterpiece" drawn up by pro-unification activists, scholars, government officials and China-based Taiwanese businesspeople. Its "consensus" was reached by a tiny percentage of Taiwan's population of 23 million. Therefore, this resolution should not be regarded as a party platform or even a national policy.
The policy of "active opening" has done great damage to Taiwan's economy. In excess of 40 percent of Taiwan's manufacturing now takes place abroad, mainly in China. In the manufacture of information technology products, the figure is 73.6 percent, and 100 percent for notebook computers.
Ninety percent of Taiwan's foreign investments are now in China. This has, in turn, hurt business in Taiwan's major commercial ports. Exports have fallen, damaging Taiwan's position as a transshipment hub. As a result, China's high-technology output is now the world's second largest. And no other nation is more dependent on China than Taiwan.
But the greatest damage has been caused by the legitimization of a course of action that is tantamount to financing our enemies. The policy of "active opening" creates the false impression that China is a benefactor, rather than an enemy, so that when former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) "joined hands with China against Taiwan," the public response was one of apathy.
The policy was also responsible for the rout of the pan-green camp in the three-in-one local elections last December.
It is at the very heart of China's strategy to "promote unification through economics" and to "apply political pressure through commerce." As long as Taiwan persists with this flawed policy, the pro-China lobby will grow stronger and, ultimately, China will swallow this country whole.
Realizing the danger of the policy of "active opening," Chen has proposed "active management" as the country's new direction.
He must be allowed to take the next logical step and abolish the National Unification Council and the Guidelines for National Unification.
Otherwise, these anachronisms will lead Taiwan down the treacherous path to "unification" with China.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS