Since the 1980s Japan has been trying to transform itself into a "normal" nation: since it began on its path to democratization, Taiwan has been trying to do the same thing.
In fact, there are quite a few East Asian countries in pursuit of this very same goal, including North Korea and China.
Japan falls short of being "normal" in that its political and diplomatic status is inconsistent with its role as one of the globe's economic superpowers. Furthermore, it is still bound by its "peaceful" Constitution despite the fact that it commands the most powerful military in the East Asian region, not counting the US presence. Taiwan is not a "normal" country because there is no agreement as to whether it is a sovereign nation, even among its own people. Both of these countries are split on how they see themselves.
The same is true for China, and its schizophrenic view of its position in the world has so far made it impossible for it to develop a harmonious and appropriate foreign policy. Take its policy on Japan: on the one hand it is worried the US will remain in East Asia and continue its strategic alliance with Tokyo, containing China's expansion through its "island chain" strategy.
On the other, it is concerned the US will retreat from the region, leaving Japan free to develop its national defense forces, which may include nuclear weapons, an eventuality that will scupper China's chances of becoming the region's only superpower. China's policy is, therefore, contradictory when it comes to US-Japan relations.
China's foreign policy regarding Russia is another case in point. In the past, China looked to Russia for leadership, but now tends to look down on it. It continues, however, to rely heavily on Moscow for military technology.
Their relationship has become more complex recently in a world where oil and raw materials are becoming more valuable. Russia is rich in both, whereas China suffers from insufficient supplies. China's policy regarding Russia, then, is also contradictory.
China originally saw the US as an enemy, and in a multi-polar world wanted to position itself to offset the power of the US. However, since Sept. 11 Beijing has been forced to accept the US' status as the world's only superpower, and it also relies on the US as a market for its goods. As far as China is concerned, the US is an obstacle to its expansion, but given the situation it had to transfer its energies from opposing the US to opposing Japan, which it sees as complicit in US obstruction of its ambitions. In this, China is again contradictory.
China relies on Taiwanese entrepreneurs to help it build up its foreign reserves and for technology transfer. At the same time, it is doing everything to strangle Taiwan's efforts to participate in the international community. It considers itself superior to India, but secretly envies its software industry. None of this reflects consistency.
The EU was born out of the need to prevent far-reaching and deep-seated enmity between European countries. Germany and France, where nationalism was once rife, now work together. Given that the East Asian countries we have already mentioned are not considered "normal" countries, such a thought may be inconceivable for the time being, and the conflicts we see now between China and Japan present another obstacle.
This is the reason that some believe the issue that might ignite war in East Asia is not the North Korea problem, or Taiwan, but relations between China and Japan. Unfortunately, China may well need to become a "normal" country first, before it can allow the same of Japan. And it is unlikely that this is going to happen any time soon.
Lin Cho-shui is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS