Since the 1980s Japan has been trying to transform itself into a "normal" nation: since it began on its path to democratization, Taiwan has been trying to do the same thing.
In fact, there are quite a few East Asian countries in pursuit of this very same goal, including North Korea and China.
Japan falls short of being "normal" in that its political and diplomatic status is inconsistent with its role as one of the globe's economic superpowers. Furthermore, it is still bound by its "peaceful" Constitution despite the fact that it commands the most powerful military in the East Asian region, not counting the US presence. Taiwan is not a "normal" country because there is no agreement as to whether it is a sovereign nation, even among its own people. Both of these countries are split on how they see themselves.
The same is true for China, and its schizophrenic view of its position in the world has so far made it impossible for it to develop a harmonious and appropriate foreign policy. Take its policy on Japan: on the one hand it is worried the US will remain in East Asia and continue its strategic alliance with Tokyo, containing China's expansion through its "island chain" strategy.
On the other, it is concerned the US will retreat from the region, leaving Japan free to develop its national defense forces, which may include nuclear weapons, an eventuality that will scupper China's chances of becoming the region's only superpower. China's policy is, therefore, contradictory when it comes to US-Japan relations.
China's foreign policy regarding Russia is another case in point. In the past, China looked to Russia for leadership, but now tends to look down on it. It continues, however, to rely heavily on Moscow for military technology.
Their relationship has become more complex recently in a world where oil and raw materials are becoming more valuable. Russia is rich in both, whereas China suffers from insufficient supplies. China's policy regarding Russia, then, is also contradictory.
China originally saw the US as an enemy, and in a multi-polar world wanted to position itself to offset the power of the US. However, since Sept. 11 Beijing has been forced to accept the US' status as the world's only superpower, and it also relies on the US as a market for its goods. As far as China is concerned, the US is an obstacle to its expansion, but given the situation it had to transfer its energies from opposing the US to opposing Japan, which it sees as complicit in US obstruction of its ambitions. In this, China is again contradictory.
China relies on Taiwanese entrepreneurs to help it build up its foreign reserves and for technology transfer. At the same time, it is doing everything to strangle Taiwan's efforts to participate in the international community. It considers itself superior to India, but secretly envies its software industry. None of this reflects consistency.
The EU was born out of the need to prevent far-reaching and deep-seated enmity between European countries. Germany and France, where nationalism was once rife, now work together. Given that the East Asian countries we have already mentioned are not considered "normal" countries, such a thought may be inconceivable for the time being, and the conflicts we see now between China and Japan present another obstacle.
This is the reason that some believe the issue that might ignite war in East Asia is not the North Korea problem, or Taiwan, but relations between China and Japan. Unfortunately, China may well need to become a "normal" country first, before it can allow the same of Japan. And it is unlikely that this is going to happen any time soon.
Lin Cho-shui is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS