People often argue that one should not mix politics with sports. For the longest time however, Taiwan has been victimized by China's bullying and its athletes forced to compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" at various international events thanks to the pact signed in 1981 between the then Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and the International Olympic Committee.
While it is understandable that Taiwan needs to honor the pact and thus follow the rules set out in the agreement -- which stated that in return for being allowed to participate in international sporting events, sports teams must use the name "Chinese Taipei" and fly the "Chinese Taipei Olympic flag" -- it should be a different fight when it comes to non-Olympic events.
Taiwan, however, is still being forced to use the label "Chinese Taipei" in non-Olympic events such as the World Baseball Classic.
The upcoming Classic is neither an Olympic event nor an event held under the auspices of the UN. It is an international tournament featuring mayor league players. It will be staged for the first time next month, with the final game scheduled to be played in San Diego, California.
While the online encyclopedia Wikipedia deserves kudos for using Taiwan as the nation's title when listing the 16 participating teams, the World Baseball Classic's official Web site lists the national team under the name "Chinese Taipei," while China has listed the team under the name "China, Taipei" on its Web site.
China's vulgar act has drawn the ire of Taiwanese Web surfers. It should, however, remind all Taiwanese that they should refuse to be silent in the face of China's incessant coercion and oppression.
Since the 1981 pact condemned Taiwan to the name "Chinese Taipei," protests over the title at non-Olympic events have drawn rapid opposition from China and have led to accusations of "politicizing sports."
But who are the people of "Chinese Taipei"? This ghost does not exist on any map.
According to a survey conducted last year by the Government Information Office, a majority of people in the US, Japan and Germany view Taiwan as "Taiwan," not "Chinese Taipei," "China, Taipei," or "part of China" for that matter.
According to a recent poll conducted by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper), almost 60 percent of respondents viewed themselves as Taiwanese. Just 8.6 percent said they considered themselves to be Chinese.
Should Taiwan continue playing dumb and tolerating these indignities, it will appear increasingly natural for the international community and Taiwanese themselves to use this wretched title.
While Taiwan is bound for the moment by the 1981 pact, this does not mean that the nation should passively accept alternative titles at other international events.
All the affected government agencies -- from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports -- should fight to increase Taiwan's visibility and win it respect in domestic and international settings.
If politicizing sports is what it takes to defend this nation's dignity, then so be it. Only the terminally naive could argue that "Chinese Taipei" does not represent an ongoing political insult.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS