Let's begin with The Nelson Report, a daily newsletter on global affairs. On Feb. 2, editor Chris Nelson wrote that US President George W. Bush was again "furious" at President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). The alleged criticism from Bush in the report was harsh, and was passed on to the reader as if Nelson had heard it in person. The report was considered sensational by many, yet it was taken as serious news and received a lot of attention in Taiwan. The purpose of this was to use the report to oppress Chen.
How much credibility does the report have? Heritage Foundation Research Fellow John Tkacik believes that its credibility is low, because Dennis Wilder, the US National Security Council's acting director for Asia, said in a White House meeting on the Taiwan issue on Feb. 4 that the US should treat Taiwan fairly. The pro-China official's remarks pointed out two things: first, Bush was not furious at Chen.
More importantly, Washington admitted that it has failed to handle cross-strait issues fairly. Indeed, due to the Middle East crisis, the US urgently needs Russia's and China's cooperation. So it oppresses Taiwan in order to achieve this goal. To be honest, this is not only unfair, but also undermines US interests in the long run.
US officials and think tanks have repeatedly emphasized the need to protect Taiwan in order to uphold its democracy. But is the US defending Taiwan from communist China just to uphold democracy? Not necessarily. In the era of martial law and the White Terror under the authoritarian rule of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the US still made great efforts to protect Taiwan. Thus, democracy is only one of the US' concerns. It also has a greater strategic consideration: safeguarding its strategic deployment in the Pacific Ocean. Taiwan is a friendly ally that the US cannot afford to lose. But although the US has vowed to defend its national interests in this region, its strategic insights are questionable.
As Washington attacked Chen's proposal to abolish the National Unification Council and the unification guidelines, it did not criticize former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) or People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) after their visits to China. From their unity with the communists to KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) claim of unification as the party's eventual goal, they show that the pan-blue camp is pro-China, anti-US and anti-Japan. In other words, the camp is echoing Beijing. It is evident that unification under the Chinese communists' banner is Ma's eventual goal.
Taiwan will move toward unification if Ma is elected president in 2008. By that time, both Taiwan's democracy and the US advantage in the Pacific Ocean will be irreversibly harmed, while the US-Japan Security Treaty will exist in name only. The US has repeatedly told the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to maintain the "status quo." But it ignores the pan-blue camp and Beijing's preparations for future unification. Thus, as the US restrains Chen's localization push, it is in fact helping China, which is both anti-US and anti-Japan. If Ma wins the 2008 presidential election, the two sides will then be unified. Taiwan will perish and the US will be forced to withdraw from the strait.
After the unification of Taiwan and China, it will be too late for US regrets. Washington will bury Taiwan's democracy, the democratic system built by the 23 million people here, and its control of Asia. It will also lose its laurels as the global protector of democracy. Does the US want to support the democratic or the authoritarian side? The answer depends on how wise it is.
Chin Heng-wei is the editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS