A redefinition of the freedom of expression that incorporates "standardized" universally accepted religious taboos is becoming increasingly necessary in the light of the enormous row triggered by the controversial Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, prominent academics and media experts suggested on Thursday.
They contend that the caricatures, regarded throughout the Islamic world as blasphemous, had nothing to do with freedom of expression, but rather reflect a developed version of "Islamophobia" that started to gather momentum after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the US.
"There are religious axioms which are enshrined in the well-established international norms and conventions, and the Western world does know they should be respected," said Ibrahim Ezzedine, chairman of Jordan's state-run Higher Media Council.
"I believe it is high time for such taboos to be standardized in a clearer manner," he added. "The respect for divine ideologies should be given priority on human rights and personal freedoms which are unequivocally protected under international law and agreements."
Ezzedine, a former information minister, spoke as Arab and Islamic outrage over the cartoons threatened to blow up into new dimensions in Arab and Islamic countries, rejecting arguments by the governments of Denmark and other countries that the caricatures were published under the principle of freedom of expression.
He agreed that the publication of the cartoons reflected an "Islamophobia" on the part of some Western countries that sought to establish an across-the-board linkage between Islam and terrorism in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the US.
"They started to target political Islam and they are now turning their arsenal into the core Islamic ideology," Ezzeddine said.
Muslim masses are increasingly convinced that the caricatures, which were originally published in September by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, were designed to give the impression that the prophet of Islam was a "terrorist."
One of the cartoons showed Mohammed wearing a turban in the shape of a bomb with a burning fuse. Another portrayed him with a bushy, gray beard wielding a sword, his eyes covered by a black rectangle. A third pictured a middle-aged prophet in the desert with a walking stick in front of a donkey and a sunset.
Islam bars any depiction of the prophet even respectful ones, out of concern that such images could lead to idolatry.
The cartoons were reprinted in January by the Norwegian magazine, Magazinet, while several papers in European and other countries volunteered to reprint them over the past week in what appeared to the Islamic world as a gesture of support for the Danish paper.
"They do not realize in the West that an absolute freedom of expression does not exist, and there are ethical controls that should be reckoned with," Taysir Abu Arja, professor of media at the Petra University, said.
"This is why newspapers in certain European countries, like Britain, have refrained from reprinting the caricatures and went further to criticize their publication by European papers," he said.
Abu Arja cited the confiscation of part of the press freedoms in the US by the administration of President George W. Bush for "serving its strategic targets in Iraq and elsewhere" as another evidence of the restricted freedom of press in Western countries.
"I believe freedom of expression should now be redefined so as to underline responsibility and ethics as key elements of a sophisticated press," he said.
Arja added that he was opposed to violent reactions in the Arab and Islamic countries to the cartoons and saw the remedy in starting a "rational dialogue" involving governments, parliaments and other institutions from the two sides.
"However, the ball is now in the court of Denmark and other concerned countries which must acknowledge [their] mistake first and try to correct it," he said.
Taher Adwan, chief editor of the daily newspaper Alarab Alyawm, viewed the solidarity expressed with Jyllands-Posten by a string of newspapers in countries extending from Europe to New Zealand as evidence of "hatred harbored against the world's 1.3 billion Muslims and their culture.
"The blasphemy against the Prophet Mohammed reflects an act of ethical deterioration that has nothing to do with the freedom of press, but rather reveals that Islam, as a religion, a culture and a civilization, is becoming a target for a dangerous attack under the pretexts either of reforms or the emancipation of women and now by printing these sacrilegious drawings," he said.
"Certainly, what some Western papers published does not represent the Western societies, but it reflects certain political objectives," he added.
Adwan expected the Vatican's condemnation of the publications of the prophet cartoons "will help to circumvent" the present turmoil.
"We also expect European civil society to step in to put an end to this defamation. Europe's politicians and media men should realize that the first step towards proper ties between the West and the Middle East lies in mutual respect and apologizing for the offense rather than adamantly going ahead with it," he said.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS