With vibrant economies and more than a billion people each, China and India might seem obvious candidates for the Group of Eight (G8), but analysts say the road to membership will be long.
Russia is now heading the G8 for the first time, inevitably triggering questions about why the two Asian giants have not joined long ago.
China must look on from the sidelines, although it has an economy that is roughly five times larger than Russia's.
A G8 finance ministers' meeting in Moscow on Friday and yesterday grouped Russia with what were once seen as the world's mightiest economies: the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the US.
China officially became the world's fourth largest economy after recording GDP growth of 9.9 percent last year, and is a top priority for most nations when they look at their trade strategies.
Its official stance, repeated by local government-employed researchers, is a pronounced lack of interest in membership.
"It's not the right time for China to join," said Niu Jun (
Even so, China's views are shifting away from a traditional dismissal of the G8 as a rich man's club, according to observers.
This is partly because the current generation of leaders around Chinese President Hu Jintao (
But its entry into the WTO in late 2001, made possible only after opening its economy wider to foreign competition, may cause some renewed hesitation.
"China would now like to enjoy G8 member status but is wary of a new vehicle for concessions," said Jane Skanderup, an expert on the Asian political economy at the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Using membership as a bait, the G8 could try to pressure China on revaluing its currency or even on democratization, she said.
While not enthusiastically pursuing the G8, China actively seeks to promote other multilateral forums where it can shine more easily, according to Ralph Cossa, director of Honolulu-based think tank Pacific Forum CSIS.
"China attaches priority to new forums where it can increase its diplomatic profile, especially among its neighbors, and preferably when it is the biggest kid at the party," he said.
One instance of this is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which groups China with Russia and a cluster of small Central Asian republics, he said.
In contrast to China's lukewarm attitude toward the G8, India seems to be all in favor of membership.
"India would like to be part of the G8 if invited. But it's up to the G8 to decide on expanding the group and include whoever it wants," a senior New Delhi government official said.
That leaves the issue of what the G8 itself thinks about inviting a large, new country.
Russia's recent decision to use its energy exports as a political weapon against Ukraine may serve as a warning.
"Russia's energy shenanigans with the Ukraine has alerted G8 members to the hazards of prematurely extending membership to an `immature' democracy and economy," Skanderup said.
Cossa also said that the G8 is, in principle, a gathering of free-market democracies and China does not fall into either category.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS