In his Lunar New Year address, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) pointed out that he would seriously consider the feasibility of abolishing the National Unification Council and the National Unification Guidelines. Clearly, on the heels of his New Year speech, Chen has once again told Taiwanese that they should pursue their own direction and refuse to be oppressed by China on the political and economic fronts. I genuinely hope that Taiwanese can give Chen the confidence to pursue such a goal and urge him not to falter in the face of adversity.
However, Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) labeled Chen's remarks a "breach of trust," threatening that "Chen is going to pay a high price for his behavior" as if he was speaking on behalf of Beijing.
Is Chen's message actually a breach of trust? Certainly not. If we are concerned about the future development of Taiwan, we should understand that both the National Unification Council and the National Unification Guidelines should have been scrapped when Beijing passed its "Anti-Secession" Law last March. Therefore, "seriously considering" whether or not to get rid of a government agency and a doctrine whose goal is the achievement of cross-strait unification is not at all problematic.
China's "Anti-Secession" Law legitimizes the use of force against Taiwan, which is tantamount to declaring war on Taiwan.
Besides, over the years, China's military has kept an increasing number of ballistic missiles targeted at Taiwan and aimed to establish what it called contingency-response combat capabilities by next year, building up combat capabilities for large-scale military engagement by 2010 and to ensure victory in a decisive battle by 2015. In view of this plan, isn't Beijing simply preparing for a thorough alteration of the status quo in the Taiwan Strait?
We should understand that Chen proposed the "Four Noes" on the condition that China abstain from using military force against Taiwan. However, the "Anti-Secession" Law is a clear indication that Beijing has every intention of waging war on Taiwan. China's actions have invalidated any promises Chen made, for it has already unilaterally changed the status quo by enacting the "Anti-Secession" Law.
We cannot but wonder if it is reasonable for the world to ask Taiwan to keep its promise while allowing Beijing to unilaterally change the status quo.
I would like to urge all the nation's opposition leaders not to be lenient toward our enemy any more, for it has already committed a breach of trust by authorizing the use of force against Taiwan. If we appease the Chinese aggressor, Taiwan will only suffer as a result.
Faced with China's provocative intentions to challenge the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, we should remain unwavering. Thus, scrapping the National Unification Council is a proper reaction to China's constant provocative actions. Only by doing so can we achieve the actual status quo across the Taiwan Strait.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS