The Government Information Office on Tuesday raised the possibility of banning foreign soap operas from prime-time television. Although a final decision has not been made, this announcement has invited a lot of criticism from fans of foreign soap operas.
From a free market perspective, banning foreign soap operas from prime-time television might not be an optimal idea for pleasing the general public. But the question is whether locally produced soap operas are ready for free market competition.
When it comes to free trade and free market enterprise, developed economies and developing economies always hold very different opinions. The economy or country that has a comparative advantage in most industrial sectors would want trading partners to open their markets all the way, while developing economies or countries in which certain sectors are struggling would do all they can to protect their vulnerable industries.
In a nutshell, the game of comparative advantage is the rule of thumb for international trade. The fact that Taiwan imports more South Korean soap operas than it exports to South Korea, simply means that Seoul has a competitive advantage in the industry of soap opera production. So should Taiwanese not empathize with the local soap opera industry as much as the agricultural sector? Why do people not want to protect some of their disadvantaged sectors when they do require protection? Why do some protesters represent or empathize with only certain disadvantaged sectors? The double standards applied to the local soap opera industry and agricultural sector are not rational at all.
Both Japan and South Korea have long restricted foreign soap operas on prime-time television to protect their own industries. When other countries do not want to play fair, Taiwan needs to reconsider its game plan. Unless Japan and South Korea also open their markets, there is no reason for Taiwan to roll out the red carpet and welcome the "cultural invasion." Banning foreign soap operas from prime-time television is merely an attempt at making an unequal situation more fair.
It is irrational to oppose the proposal of removing foreign soap operas from prime-time slots, as not doing so will enable foreign soap opera producers to sustain their dominance.
In addition, Taiwan's local soap opera industry really has to start focusing on creating quality products. After all, the "non-tariff barrier" is only good for the short term. Creating a long-term vision and aiming for high quality is the way to promote sustainable development.
Darson Chiu is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,