A recent comment by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
In a discussion concerning cross-strait flights Ma stated, "But the government just can't figure out its policy priorities, and it pushes for constitutional re-engineering when what people want is a better economy" ("Ma backtracks on referendum proposal," Jan. 7, page 3). Without even addressing the glaring inconsistencies in Ma's position on the referendum issue, it is important to note the danger embodied in his statement.
Ma only states the obvious here; of course the people of Taiwan want a better economy. Yet a better economy is not all the people of Taiwan want.
The people of Taiwan also want further democratic development, a more efficient and effective government and political stability -- all things that can best be achieved through the development of a new constitution.
The original Republic of China Constitution was not written for Taiwan, and the legal and institutional structures it created present numerous problems when it comes to governing Taiwan. The Constitution was ignored for decades as the KMT attempted to consolidate its power through military force and martial law.
In the post-martial law era the constitutional reform or amendment process has been conducted inefficiently, with an eye on preserving the existing power structure. This has led to the creation of a confusing document that precludes efficient governance.
These constitutional problems must be addressed to ensure lasting political stability in Taiwan.
Without political stability Taiwan cannot have the better economy that Ma mentions.
Unfortunately Ma's statement is in line with decades of KMT policy that sacrifice the long-term well-being of the people for the party's short-term political interests. Since the party's founding and rule in China during the early 20th century, through its takeover of Taiwan and up through the 2004 presidential election, the KMT has sacrificed political reform that would have led to long-term stability in order to protect its power.
For example, the KMT's economic policies, which promoted rapid growth, also had a devastating impact on Taiwan's environment.
Due to its fear of any opposition, the KMT government implemented harsh laws during the martial law era that prevented some of the best and brightest Taiwanese minds from contributing to national development.
While the KMT has reformed in recent years, its strong conservatism and desire to hold onto power still prevent the party from taking more courageous steps toward political reform.
To now imply that constitutional reengineering must be ignored in order to focus on improving the economy once again highlights the party's short-sightedness. It is not clear to me why having a better economy and political reform are mutually exclusive.
Clearly Ma is not saying that we should return to the martial law era, during which the KMT outlawed political reform because it claimed reform would threaten economic growth.
And of course Ma must understand that the current constitutional structure leads to a government that harms the economy due to its inefficiency.
I know that Ma is an extremely intelligent and educated man who is well aware that the line between politics and economics is very fine indeed.
So I am very surprised that he chooses to ignore the connection between constitutional reform and governmental efficiency and their impact on economic growth and progress for the people of Taiwan.
Constitutional reform is always a complex issue, and in the case of Taiwan it is made particularly complex by Taiwan's unique international situation.
Yet it is clear that political reform is essential for long-term political stability and economic growth.
Thus, Taiwan needs constitutional reform, and constitutional reform in Taiwan will require courageous and farsighted leadership.
At the present time Ma is not the right person to lead the way because he seems to lack the will to push for needed reforms and appears more concerned with short-term economic gain than the long-term political stability of Taiwan.
Of course the KMT is a powerful force and its participation in substantive political reform will be beneficial for everyone in Taiwan.
Therefore, I hope that in his role as KMT Chairman, Ma will exhibit stronger leadership and give greater attention to the dramatic need for constitutional change and political reform in Taiwan.
Don Rodgers
Texas
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS