In the wake of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Taiwan's president has wielded power poorly. In a political structure in which great power is concentrated in the hands of one man, the premier is simply not in a position to oppose the will of the president -- and we have yet to see a Cabinet that dares ignore presidential dictates. Now, after an unremarkable six-year administrative track record, Chen is attempting to pick up the pace and make up for past failings in reform. In addition to his new economic policy, he has targeted the 18 percent preferential interest for retired civil servants, the stolen assets of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), constitutional reform and a minimum tax. This flurry of activity brings to mind the saying "waiting until you are thirsty before you dig a well."
As a result of such tardiness, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is not likely to win public support. The defeats suffered by the DPP in the 2004 legislative elections and last month's local government elections where not the result of the Cabinet's failure to carry out the presidential will, but rather because they carried it out to the letter. It is Chen who must shoulder responsibility for the government's failures. As for the scandals which have ensnared various senior government officials and which are now awaiting investigation by the judiciary, neither the Presidential Office nor the Executive Yuan is likely to escape blame.
Chen ignored calls to hold fast to former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "no haste, be patient" economic policy, and instead plunged headlong into the unrestricted opening up of commercial relations with China. It was under Chen's call for a "New Middle Way" that in 2001 the government launched the misguided policy of "active opening, effective management."
We can see now that this policy, which was intended to pander to Taiwanese businesses with interests in China and China itself, has had a pernicious effect on Taiwan. Unemployment, broadly defined, has risen to a high of 7 percent, capital has fled the country and entire industries have relocated away. This kind of damage cannot be quickly remedied.
Based on past performance, Chen's new determination to better manage cross-strait economic ties prompts mixed feelings. Chen will hopefully become a fearless and charismatic leader who is undaunted by setbacks and unafraid to admit mistakes, rather than a politician who only pursues short-term advantage and bows to pressure from financial groups and trade associations. Such short-sighted behavior is exactly what has made DPP supporters lose faith in his promises.
Chen and his party must admit that the DPP has lost the ideals it once had as a local party under Chen's leadership. As a result of Chen's weakness, the public has also begun to let down their guard toward China's "united front" strategies and military ambitions, with some even espousing an absurd desire to unify with China. What Taiwan needs is a determination to press on with reform and a more consistent implementation of policy. In this effort, Chen has no greater enemy than himself.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS