I find the pan-blue camp's refusal to support the arms package quite disturbing for a number of reasons. First, it sends the wrong message to China and the US. To China it says that Taiwan is not interested in maintaining strong air and naval defenses. This amounts to a de facto policy of appeasement.
Such a policy will only embolden China and indeed, should re-unification occur, it will do so increasingly on Beijing's terms and not Taiwan's.
To the US the message reinforces the "status quo" of national indecision. Is Taiwan a real country or merely a "rebel province" masquerading as a country?
Given the domestic and Chinese criticism that the Bush administration received when it first offered the package in 2001, I find it alarming and bizarre that Taiwan cannot make a decision to accept or reject the proposal.
Indeed, the Bush offer was a policy reversal from the Clinton years. Should Taiwan find a Democrat in the White House in 2009, I would not be surprised if the present offer is withdrawn with no substitutes.
Furthermore, the pan-blue camp's criticism that the weapons are overpriced and aren't state-of-the-art -- and therefore should be "given" to Taiwan -- is ridiculous and demonstrates the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) limited scope of thinking.
Should the US, by this logic, simply "hand out" our latest cutting edge weapons to Canada, Japan, Britain and whomever else we deem to be our "friend," such a policy would not receive one vote in the US Congress.
Personally, I do not see how the US government, whose first obligation is the defense of US territory and its citizens, could even sell the latest weapons to a military that today is Taiwanese but tomorrow could be China's.
To do so would be irresponsible. It will not happen.
The fact remains that the weapons package is aimed at adequately protecting Taiwan's naval and air theaters of operation, both of which are absolutely paramount in successfully repelling a Chinese attack.
The package also gives Taiwan more time -- albeit very limited time -- to do what needs to be done: declare Taiwan a real, independent republic and acknowledge the People's Republic of China as the real China.
Martin Mitchell
Department of Geography, Minnesota State University
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs