For the last two days we have discussed President Chen Shui-bian's (
Everyone can talk the talk, but the real question is: Can Chen walk the walk?
The situation, hopefully, will not degenerate into something similar to what inspired former president Lee Teng-hui (
By all means, kudos should be extended to Chen for his reiteration of the principle of sovereignty, the DPP's core values and adopting a more aggressive position on cross-strait economic policy (albeit with cumbersome slogans): moving from an "active opening, effective management" approach to "active management, effective opening."
People are no fools, however. No matter how eloquent or grating a politician's speech may be, the public knows all too well what games are being played.
Rather than indulging in flowery word games and coining catchy slogans to get their supporters' blood racing, what Taiwanese really care about is what the government can do to ensure that they can maintain a better standard of living.
What a struggling father of three in some remote countryside cares about is whether he will have enough money in his account to pay for his kids' tuition in the coming semester. What a working single mom cares about is whether she can count on arriving home safely after doing her night shift at a factory.
In other words, practical stuff. What about the new pension plan that Chen spoke of before the local government elections, which he pledged would replace the 18 percent preferential interest rate that he said had been unfairly benefiting retired teachers, military personnel and civil servants? Who knows?
Then there are other social issues, such as the growing suicide rate among young people, which could do with a bit more conspicuous attention. The impression that the average person receives, however, is that, more often than not, government officials and lawmakers would rather appear busy locking horns than solving real problems.
The power awarded to political representatives by the people is not a plaything for fame or license to engage in a bitter war of words or to court media deference in the next day's papers.
Social issues, as minor as any single issue may seem, are what touch people's hearts, earn the government respect and therefore earn this nation respect as a democratic country.
While policies relating to cross-strait relations, economics, defense and foreign affairs are critical and have a direct bearing on national security, the "little things" can add up in a surprisingly damaging way for those politicians who neglect them.
As another year begins, this country is surely looking forward to a government that can attend to not only the bigger picture but also -- through more substantial acts involving subtle problems -- start reconnecting and touching people's hearts.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS