Taiwan not foreigner-friendly
When reading about an English carnival designed to make foreigners "feel at home" in Taiwan ("English carnival celebrates `foreigner-friendly Taiwan,'" Dec. 21, page 2), I felt quite amused.
How can you celebrate a foreigner-friendly environment in a country where taxi drivers cannot even recognize the most famous international hotel's English name? How can foreigners feel at home in a place where it is virtually impossible to have a local wife or girlfriend without the partner being ostracized by large parts of society? Nor is it very foreigner-friendly to teach a useless, local dialect called "Taiwanese" in schools. Not to mention the new pension law, which simply excludes foreigners altogether.
In fact, Taiwan is an almost hopeless provincial nest, and efforts to promote English do not really make much difference.
In Taiwan, especially among pan-green supporters, there is a kind of "Taiwan supremacist" attitude. They look down on Chinese, they despise Vietnamese and Thai nationals, and they also feel deeply suspicious about white foreigners.
Why do so many foreigners live in Singapore and love it over there? Because no girl's parents mind their daughter dating "foreigners" and expat children are taught proper Chinese (Mandarin) and English at public schools -- not to mention the friendliness and high standards of service in Singapore.
The government -- and the Democratic Progressive Party in particular -- should open their hearts and minds to people born outside of Taiwan and be more tolerant to all foreigners -- not only the white, English-speaking ones like me -- rather than holding a ridiculous "English carnival." The pan-green camp should study the Singaporean model rather than promote "Taiwanization" -- a scheme clearly opposed not only to Mainlanders, but also to foreigners.
Of course, foreigners who want to stay in Taiwan should learn Chinese and adapt to Chinese thinking and way of life. However, I am worried that such foreigners are not really attracted to Taiwan by the sometimes bizarre moves to promote the Taiwanese language.
And by the way, most foreigners in Taiwan are not native English speakers.
Richard Zuercher
Taipei
Exposing KMT and PFP lies
Your article ("KMT to scrutinize any new arms plan," Dec. 19, page 3) says that the opposition in the legislature stated that the Patriot missile batteries "stand no chance" of obtaining their approval because they were "vetoed" during the first national referendum held in tandem with last year's presidential election.
It is a bare-faced lie to argue that the arms are not wanted, because the referendum didn't achieve the 50 percent total of voters required to be valid. The question posed in the referendum about "more money for weapons" would have been genuinely vetoed by Taiwanese citizens if the majority had answered "no." However, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party played dirty by instructing their supporters not to vote in the referendum, rather than voting "no."
In the same manner, they lie when they talk about the 1992 "one China" consensus. What consensus? Saying that there is "one China" while agreeing to disagree on the meaning is plain ridiculous. Even a child can tell us that the product of a positive and a negative is a negative.
Similarly, agreeing to disagree just means disagreeing and the result is no consensus.
How can they try to pass a law based on such a "consensus"? This is just insulting people's intelligence. If the KMT and its allies believe that there is only "one China," then they should tell us what this really means and where Taiwan stands in all this.
Steve Tsou
France
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused