The conflict over the future of Taiwan is usually seen as a triangular struggle between China, Taiwan -- where the majority seeks to retain their separation from China -- and the US, which is Taiwan's security guarantor.
That is changing, contends a new study by the National Bureau of Asian Research, a non-partisan institute in Seattle. It argues that the Taiwan question has become quadrangular, with Japan having become the fourth nation directly engaged in potentially the most explosive clash in Asia.
Japan's entry into the Taiwan issue is yet another indication of Tokyo's active emergence in Asian international relations after decades of taking a pacifist and passive stance, or what the Japanese call "low posture."
Moreover, the study suggests that East Asia is becoming ever more divided into Chinese and US blocs. Specifically, it says, "if a military confrontation occurred between the US and China over Taiwan, US policymakers can rest assured of Japan's support."
US President George W. Bush seemed to underscore Japan's new position on Taiwan last month in a speech he made in Kyoto, Japan's ancient capital, by including warm praise for Taiwan. He applauded Taiwan for having "moved from repression to democracy as it liberalized its economy." Bush lauded the people of Taiwan for being "free, democratic and prosperous." The Chinese, who insist that the Taiwan issue is an internal question of no concern to the US, were not pleased.
The assessment of Japan-Taiwan relations was written by two retired US naval officers experienced in Asian affairs, Michael McDevitt and James Auer; two Japanese academics, Yoshihide Soeya of Keio University and Tetsuo Kotani of Doshisha University; and Philip Yang (楊永明) of National Taiwan University.
The study asserts that: "Taiwan's quiet initiative to push for a greater level of informal defense contacts with Japan arises in no small part from shared history and democratic values, common strategic constraints and island threat environments, as well as the close relations that Tokyo and Taipei maintain with the US."
The shared history relates to Japan's colonial rule of Taiwan from 1895 to 1945 after the nation was ceded by China following Japan's victory in the Sino-Japanese War. Japan's control is generally considered to have been quite benign despite several harsh episodes during the early period.
Strategically, Taiwan sits astride Japan's trade routes through Southeast Asia to the Persian Gulf, a key source of oil, and on through the Suez Canal to markets in Europe. The US is tied to Taiwan by the Taiwan Relations Act, which requires Washington to help defend Taiwan; Tokyo has a security treaty with the US.
In taking this initiative, the authors say, "Taiwan has skillfully seized diplomatic leverage from China, the US, and Japan, and has used this power to promote an agenda that often tests the bounds of Beijing's tolerance."
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), however, may have overplayed his hand. In local elections earlier this month, his Democratic Progressive Party was soundly beaten by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Chen appears to have made voters worry that he might provoke China into military action against Taiwan.
Japanese sympathy for Taiwan has risen since the end of the Cold War, Soeya writes, because of the "deterioration of political and security relations between Japan and China, and Taiwan's steady democratization." He points to several dialogues between Taiwanese and Japanese legislators and favorable press coverage.
Yang writes that behind the new Japanese attitudes is a postwar generation of politicians who "believe that World War II should no longer haunt Japan's relations with its neighbors but see in China a determined unwillingness to forget the past." Bashing Japan, he says, has "become part of the political culture in China."
From the US' point of view, McDevitt says, the success of democracy in Taiwan has tipped the political balance in the US in favor of support for an embattled democracy. Before, the US seemed indifferent to Taiwan's plight.
US military leaders, however, are losing patience with Taiwan's refusal to conclude an arms purchase to which Washington agreed four years ago.
Last week, the opposition parties in the legislature, led by the KMT, voted for the 40th time not to place the arms deal on the agenda so that it could be debated and voted on.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath