On the day after Taiwan's Dec. 3 local government elections, the people of Hong Kong once again held a large-scale demonstration, demanding democracy and direct elections, rather than having their chief executive appointed by Beijing. On July 1 last year and the year before, half a million Hong Kongers took to the streets for the same reason. What a contrast to the cheerful scenes when the territory was returned to Chinese rule in 1997.
What caused the change? The main reason is that conditions in Hong Kong have slowly deteriorated since the handover. There are less freedoms, the economy has weakened and public order has worsened. Hong Kongers' quality of life and dignity have declined, because the territory is now under Beijing's thumb. Because of the economic downturn, its position in the world has steadily declined, along with foreign views of the territory.
When people talk about Hong Kong today, what they picture is no longer a free, prosperous and vigorous world-class cosmopolitan society. Instead, it is a part of the communist world with an ailing economy, collapsed public order, and limited freedom.
In the near future, I am afraid that when people talk about Hong Kong, they will talk about it as if it were Shanghai or Shenzhen, and the free and prosperous "oriental pearl" will only be a memory.
China experts in the West have said that Hong Kong is like a frog in a pot of water. It would struggle if put immediately into a pot of boiling water, but it will be cooked to death without realizing it if the water is heated up gradually. This is exactly the territory's situation today, and those who are unwilling to be cooked to death staged the recent protest to voice that sentiment.
Hong Kong's situation serves as a warning to Taiwan. After the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) thrashing in the local government elections, calls for President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to loosen his China policy in order to promote cross-strait reconciliation can be heard from both the DPP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
But if Taiwan tilts toward Beijing, the nation will gradually become a second Hong Kong. As Beijing calls on Taipei to open cross-strait links, its purpose is to hollow out Taiwan, while forcing it to accept the policy of "one country, two systems" through economic means.
Since Taiwanese people have not experienced communist rule before, they often underestimate the evilness of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The KMT is clear about the CCP's nature after having dealings with it for over 80 years. Unfortunately, some of the KMT members have united with the CCP in order to attack Taiwan. They uphold nationalism and claim that people on both sides of the strait are Chinese, so as to bypass the fundamental confrontation between democracy and authoritarianism on the two sides. They also use cross-strait economic development as bait to deceive the pure and simple Taiwanese people.
If Chen, under pressure, really leans towards the middle way and opens his China policy as KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) suggests, Taiwan will become like the frog in the water. It may be unable to feel any pain at first, but it will slowly become supper on the dinner table of China's dictators' as Beijing resorts to every conceivable means in its ongoing "united front" effort. By that time, it will be too late for Taiwanese people to learn from Hong Kongers, and too late to take to the streets to cry for help.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in New York.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US