The special arms procurement bill designed to purchase three Patriot missile batteries, eight diesel-electrical submarines and 12 P-3C Orion aircraft has been blocked again -- the 37th time -- by the pan-blue-controlled procedure committee last week. Taiwan's fractious politicians playing games with national security seemingly cannot reach any consensus on passing the arms bill in the foreseeable future. This reveals that Taiwan is facing a strategic crossroads regarding how to ensure its national security: by depending either on enemies' mercy and allies' kindness, or on our own military buildup to achieve cross-strait peace.
Taiwan can choose a path of peaceful unification with China by disarming itself and giving up its trump card. That is, by continuing to block the special arms budget bill and denying equipping itself with the state-of-art weapons. If this is possible, we have to do what China has required of us -- surrender our sovereignty, recognize the "one-China" policy, retain the status quo and enjoy our own freedom in a bird cage. Consequently, we can only accept unification on China's terms and without any wherewithal to say "no."
Taiwan can also choose, or find itself upon, a path along which the strong do as they please and the weak do as they must. In this vein, Taiwan cannot but equip itself with the advanced weaponry, allowing it not only to consolidate its bilateral relationship with the US, a vigorous ally at our side, but also to engage with China more peacefully as well as confidently in pursuit of perpetual peace across the Strait. After all, China has the final say on whether it will renounce use of force against Taiwan.
If we hope to have any say whatsoever in the destiny of our country, it is imperative that Taiwan buy these weapons to deter aggression by our enemy.
In other words, the liberty of offence will always be theirs and that of defense clearly ought to be ours; particularly as China by the day grows more powerful economically as well as militarily and we more destitute in terms of our military budget. The gap in military budgets and supremacy across the Strait is widening and tilting in China's favor.
We must build up our own self-defense muscle because the only sure basis of peace or status-quo maintenance between two rivals is for each party to be equally afraid of the other. Any rival who would like to encroach on the other is then deterred by the fact that he will not have the odds in his favor.
Of course, the future of Taiwan's national destiny is not yet set immutably on one course or another at this stage. For those who have a free choice in the matter and whose fortunes are not at stake, preparing for war by means of purchasing the arms promised by the Bush administration to secure peace in the Strait may be the greatest of follies.
But if it comes down to the core issue behind the choice between submission with loss of independence, and danger with the hope of preserving that independence, in my view, it is he who will not accept the cost and risk of war that deserves blame, not he who will.
The recent Japanese and US worries over the threat posed by China should be sufficient to make us turn to some means of safety, including seeking external alliances and investing more in military buildup. It must be thoroughly understood that the procurement of the arms for self-protection is a necessity, and the more readily we accept it, the less willing our enemies will be to launch military adventures against us. The most we should be afraid of is not our enemies' devices but our blunders in not passing the arms bill now.
Yu Tsung-chi, director of the political warfare office of the Chiayi Reserve Control Command, is also an adjunct professor at Fu Hsing Kang College.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.