How would you feel if you had been called a freak even before you were born? How would you feel if someone accused you of breaking the law before you had even conveyed a single thought?
This seems to be the case in the recent uproar over the VCDs produced by Lin Yi-fang (
Long before its content was made public, a number of pan-blue politicians such as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The problem is that none of them have actually viewed the VCDs.
So why all the exasperation, fuss and fantasies about the VCDs? All we can say -- once again -- is that this reflects absurdity, ignorance and lack of democratic capacity in these critics.
Taoyuan County police last week seized film footage in a Taipei studio that purportedly contains subject matter insinuating that Chu -- who is seeking re-election -- had had various extramarital affairs.
The Publication Law (
VCDs, as a type of publication, are protected by the freedom of speech and publication enshrined in Article 11 of the Constitution.
Freedom of speech -- as Vice President Annette Lu (
Whether the VCDs are legal or not can only be determined after they have been released.
Yet the Taoyuan police applied censorship by withholding the discs without proper reason before they were released, shockingly reminding many of us of the White Terror in the martial law era under the KMT.
It is quite ironic that a disgraceful incident such as raiding a studio would happen under the DPP administration, which prides itself on its role as a protector of freedom of expression.
In fact, some members of the DPP administration are echoing the pan-blues' arguments that releasing the VCDs is in violation of the Election and Recall Law (
DPP officials need to stop their wishful thinking that their tolerance of the pan-blues will secure more cooperation at the Legislative Yuan.
Supping with the enemy is going to gain the DPP administration neither respect nor support from the pan-blues. It will only help the pan-blues fortify their scheme to paralyze the DPP administration, and leave the government -- sadly and stupidly -- to become a witless pawn in oppressing freedom of expression all over again.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with