I would like to protest your article on King Kamehameha and address an offensive error ("Law of the splintered paddle," Nov. 7, page 13).
Anyone who understands Hawaii's history knows that an article about King Kamehameha should not be in a section called "Meeting Amazing Americans."
King Kamehameha was never an American. He was the ruler of the Kingdom of Hawaii, an independent nation. The 1993 Apology Bill passed by the US Congress states that Hawaiians have never relinquished their sovereignty and admits that the US acted illegally in overthrowing Queen Liliuokalani. King Kamehameha was not an American when he was alive, and he is certainly not now because of America's self-admitted theft of the Hawaiian Islands.
The Hawaiian people have been struggling for political and cultural freedom for over 100 years. As a longtime resident of Hawaii and as an observer with Na Koa Ikaika o Ka Lahui Hawai'i, a Native Hawaiian political organization, at the 2003 UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, I witnessed firsthand the hurdles faced by Hawaiians in reclaiming their history from ignorant or malignant foreigners.
The Taipei Times, which is generally respectful toward the indigenous people of Taiwan, in my limited experience with the paper, should be more conscientious regarding its source materials for stories about Hawaii. King Kamehameha is a fascinating historical figure and there are ample sources available from Hawaiian scholars.
Although this is an imperfect analogy, using the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) or any US government agency as source for a story on King Kamehameha is like using the official library of the People's Republic of China as a source for a story about former president Lee Teng-Hui (李登輝).
Nathan Miller
Hawaii
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past