With next month's mayoral and county commissioner elections fast approaching, whether or not Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), director of China's Taiwan Affairs Office, will be allowed to visit Taiwan has become a topic of much debate. This issue has become an important variable in election calculations.
Chen may well accept the invitation extended by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to attend a "KMT-CCP Forum" next month. The Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) has even made a formal application to China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) to negotiate the formalities surrounding the visit. Meanwhile, pan-blue legislators yesterday canceled the Mainland Affairs Council's (MAC) entire budget for next year to put pressure on it to process Chen's invitation. This action simply serves to reinforce the impact of a possible visit by Chen.
Chen's motive for coming to Taiwan is ostensibly to participate in the forum and improve his understanding of Taiwan. The fact is, however, that as director of the Taiwan Affairs Office, Chen is already familiar with Taiwanese affairs. And having received a steady stream of pan-blue politicians in Beijing over recent months, neither is he a stranger to Taiwanese politicians. Rather than the stated intention, the purpose of his visit is to promote China's "united front" strategy by knitting the KMT, the People First Party and the New Party even more closely together in their opposition to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
As he is in charge of both the Taiwan Affairs Office and ARATS, and thus the Chinese official most closely concerned with Taiwan affairs, a visit by Chen is no ordinary occasion. This is of course something that neither the MAC nor the SEF can ignore. Regardless of whether Chen meets with officials from these two organizations or other government officials, there is protocol to follow and security matters to arrange. The slightest oversight could lead to cross-strait conflict or an international incident, and this is why it is only reasonable that the SEF wishes to discuss arrangements of the visit with ARATS.
China's avoidance of official contact with the SEF is its way of telling the world that it is intentionally boycotting cross-strait contact and dialogue. This can only have a negative impact on cross-strait peace. Chen's disrespect for the people of Taiwan, his possible hosts, is offensive to say the least. The Taiwanese people should not take this lying down. The issue has been aggravated by the budget-slashing actions of the pan-blue camp. It is a case of beating the host to please the guest. Pandering to China in this way, so close to the elections, will certainly have an impact on the results.
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has received a hammering for his entanglement in the scandal involving former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (陳哲男). The DPP's election campaign has been in disarray as a result, but the emergence of this new issue has opened another front. Polemics on cross-strait relations have always been the DPP's forte, and now that the pan-blue camp has made the opening moves, it doesn't really matter if Chen actually visits. With this issue slowly coming to the boil, the DPP campaign has got a second wind, and tonight President Chen should be able to sleep more easily in his bed.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing