Although the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has put a lot of effort into negotiating with the pan-blue camp to solve the controversy over the cross-strait peace advancement bill, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) are proceeding with it. If this bill is eventually approved, it will have a serious impact on Taiwan.
As this is a matter of great importance, and also because I believe that most people are not even aware of the contents and the potential impact of the bill, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), the government agency in charge of supervising cross-strait policy, would like to take this opportunity to explain the matter in detail.
First, the bill will serve to legalize the "one China" principle. The major bone of contention between Taipei and Beijing is just this principle, for Beijing believes that Taiwan is part of the People's Republic of China, which most Taiwanese find unacceptable.
Furthermore, Article 1 of the bill stipulates acknowledgement of (that is, to bring into force) the "1992 consensus." This is unfortunately tantamount to helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) force the nation to accept the "one China" principle and enacting a subsidiary law to Beijing's "Anti-Secession" Law. In short, the legislation would put the nation at risk. In addition, ideological commitment in regard to this issue is so uncompromising that use of any legislation to restrain discussion will only lead to severe political unrest. We should seek to avoid such a thorny situation when dealing with China.
Second, the bill is obviously unconstitutional. The "cross-strait peace committee" that would be established under the bill would push ahead with major cross-strait affairs and take the initiative in negotiating with Beijing. That is, the bill would enable the legislature to empower another organ to handle cross-strait issues, a job already being performed by the MAC, and usurp the rights of the executive. This is a clear violation of the checks and balances between the executive and the legislature.
Third, the bill violates a bylaw of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), which was ratified by the legislature when KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was serving as vice chairman of the MAC. Three years ago, the bylaw was even amended by the governing and opposition parties to lay out regulations relating to cross-strait affairs, and it is now regarded as the most important guiding principle on the cross-strait issue.
However, the bill and the legislative drive to lead cross-strait affairs directly contradict the aforementioned act as well as the guiding principles relating to cross-strait policy.
Fourth, the bill is a violation of democratic principles. The main thrust of the bill, as it claims, is to prevent the government from slipping up when formulating policy and to form a committee within the legislature to represent "the Taiwanese" in negotiations with Beijing. However, Taiwan is a nation that already holds democratic elections and periodically elects a president.
Legislators, chosen by the electorate, are there to supervise the operations of the government. Enacting such a bill will mandate the Legislative Yuan to dictate cross-strait policy, a flagrant violation of democratic principles. Furthermore, Article 7 of the bill stipulates that government agencies throughout the nation and the general public must comply with the resolutions proposed by a cross-strait peace committee.
Whoever refuses to enforce the resolutions will be subject to investigation by the judiciary and the supervisory arms of the government. Such a committee could simultaneously wield executive, legislative and judicial powers, creating a monster depriving people of the right to choose. This would clearly damage Taiwan's democratic achievements.
Fifth, divisions between the pan-blue and pan-green camps will cause even further deterioration. If the legislature is able to set up a cross-strait peace committee and wrest the right to formulate cross-strait policy from the executive, it could also adopt a similar approach or pass a similar law and usurp the roles of other government agencies, turning the legislature into an autocratic organ. This would amount to a declaration of war by the legislature against the executive, and by no means is this a situation that Taiwanese want to see.
Faced with such an unstable political climate, the Taiwanese people must put aside their ideological differences and jointly ensure the well-being of the nation, rather than engage in an independence-unification dispute that could trigger more political unrest.
However, as the legislature is eventually going to take a vote on the cross-strait peace advancement bill, I feel responsible for bringing this issue to the public's attention and explaining the consequences we will have to face if it is passed by the legislature.
I also would like to urge people to understand that this bill is unlikely to bring about peace, and will only cause more political disputes and unrest.
Joseph Wu is chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s