After 35 years in safekeeping with a US war veteran, the diary of a Vietnamese army doctor has hit bookstores in Vietnam and become an instant bestseller with its unusually personal take on war.
A warts-and-all portrayal of the horrors of war or of intrigues in the trenches it is not.
But the diary has caught the imagination of Vietnamese readers as it makes a break from the undiluted heroism and self-sacrificial mush dished out in many a propaganda tome in the decades since the Vietnam War ended in 1975.
The Diary of Dang Thuy Tram contains her thoughts and feelings when she served in the battlefields of the central province of Quang Ngai in 1967 until she was killed in June 1970, aged 27.
Emotions have been carefully excised in Vietnam's huge collection of war memorabilia and most are thought to be doctored or even entirely fictional accounts.
And what adds gravitas to Thuy Tram's diary is its "strange journey" and hibernation before publication in Vietnam, as her mother, Doan Ngoc Tram puts it.
"Thuy Tram's diaries had been kept by American army officer Frederic Whitehurst for 35 years before it came back home to me," Ngoc Tram said.
In 1970, when reviewing Vietnamese communist forces' documents recovered during combat for the military intelligence detachment he worked in, Whitehurst was about to burn the diary, deeming it useless but his interpreter, Nguyen Trung Hieu, objected.
"As I burned documents, he stopped me. He was holding the diary and told me, `don't burn this book, Fred, it already has fire in it.' I was so moved that he would honor an enemy soldier that I did as he asked," Whitehurst said in an e-mail to the author's family earlier this year.
He went back to the US in 1972 as a 24-year-old and took the diary with him. For many years there was no question of trying to return it to the family of the author as the war only ended in 1975 and the aftermath was chaotic.
Whitehurst joined the FBI in 1982.
"I could never have approached representatives of a communist nation with requests to help me find the family of Dr. Tram," he said in an e-mail. "The FBI would never have allowed it."
Ten more years later, "I decided I did not care what the FBI felt about this task, that I would go about it," Whitehurst, who now works as a lawyer, said. He began to look for ways of publicizing the diary and resumed the quest for Tram's family.
He was joined in his efforts by his older brother Robert, another Vietnam veteran, and finally with the help of the Vietnam Archives in Lubbock, Texas, they located the family early this year.
It then took them months to persuade Tram's mother to allow the diary's publication.
"I saw that they were obsessed by the war and mentally they had suffered a lot from its consequences. The diary showed them that the war was futile and they greatly regretted it," Ngoc Tram said.
Describing the war zone on Feb. 21, 1970, her daughter says: "Once again, death was so close to me ... Some HU-1A [helicopters] fought in our place for more than one hour.
"We were only dozens of meters from them. Sounds of gunfire were echoing in our ears. My comrades and I were sitting under the shelters, not knowing when a bullet would hit us. Death seemed to be a touch-and-go thing."
An entry on Nov. 25, 1968 says: "The work load is huge, causes headache and fatigue. I wish nothing more than to peacefully get back to the comfort of a loving home.
"But a wish is just a wish, reality is reality. The heartrending groan of patients is ringing in my ears. There is so much work to do: it is complicated, difficult and even frustrating," wrote Thuy Tram, who later died from a bullet wound.
There is much hatred for Americans and a great anxiety to eject them from Vietnamese soil.
Tame stuff it would be in most countries but for Vietnamese fed on a fulsome fare of undimmed valor, this is refreshingly new.
"In the diary, the war is described as something fierce. During the war, the soldiers were often sad and had to suffer a lot. The war was not always heroism and passion," said Thuy Tram's sister, Dang Kim Tram.
Vietnam has been through decades of wars against French and US forces. The victorious regime has always painted a glowing canvas of communist troops brimming with determination and derring-do in evicting invaders.
Every year, vast sums are spent by publishing houses and filmmakers on works that are given a wide berth by the public. Historians say many heroic figures presented therein are patently unreal.
"I had not felt much for the Vietnamese soldiers' wartime conduct as they were always depicted as saints, untinged by sadness or fear although they were in the thick of fierce and bloody wars," said Nguyen Ngoc Duong, 27, a translator.
Moments of sadness have been infra dig for Vietnamese propagandists: Soldiers have invariably displayed whole-hearted devotion to the nation, with no thought of personal happiness or unhappiness.
A novel published in 1991, by a former soldier and renowned writer Bao Ninh, described bloodshed and suffering.
But its title was changed from The Sorrow of War to The Fate of Love as propaganda officials decreed the country's struggle against foreign enemies could never be one of sorrow.
While Ninh's puncturing of Vietnamese communist mythology was pathbreaking, it was nevertheless seen as a work of fiction whereas Thuy Tram's account is treated as the real stuff.
About 200,000 copies of her diary have been printed, a record as compared to the usual 2,000 copies for new releases in Vietnam.
"The diaries of Dr. Thuy Tram impressed me as there are real thoughts of a real person in war, with moments of sadness, loneliness, pain," said Duong, the translator.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
RSS