On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
In another lawsuit filed by Lien and Soong against President Chen Shui-bian (
These two lawsuits, the one against Chen and Lu and the one against the commission, were the first of their kind. Equally unprecedented was the amount of social resources diverted into these lawsuits, not to mention the level of social unrest and disturbance surrounding them. For example, the enormous cost incurred in conducting a total recount of the ballots cast in the election, a total of NT$60.10 million (US$1.8 million), was paid by the Taiwan High Court -- except for the NT$17.22 million paid by Lien and Soong -- meaning that the taxpayers picked up the tab.
Of course, Taiwan is a democratic country subject to the rule of law, so Lien and Soong had every legal right to file their lawsuits. On the other hand, these two men are not ordinary citizens; they are political leaders in whom the people have entrusted important powers. In this regard, they need to be politically accountable for every action they take -- including filing such unprecedented legal actions against the head of state and the CEC.
Unfortunately, both men have repaid the trust of the voters with utterly irresponsible behavior. The lawsuits were brought because these two leftovers from the days of martial law have a sense of entitlement. They simply could not believe -- or accept -- that it was possible to lose last year's election. In truth, they still haven't gotten over their individual losses in the 2000 presidential election.
Not one shred of credible evidence turned up in support of the government "conspiracies" or "cover-ups" they alleged about last year's election and the the election-eve assassination attempt on Chen and Lu -- now known to have been carried out by a Lien-Soong supporter -- while the alleged large-scale tampering with the ballots by the government turned out to be isolated, minor clerical and administrative errors by individuals.
Without an inkling of semi-credible proof supporting their allegations, how could they have decided to file these lawsuits? How could they destroy the sense of legitimacy in the entire constitutional process in the eyes of their supporters simply because the system failed to give the result they wanted? Their actions were irresponsible. In some countries such actions would have been seen criminal -- seditious libel. And all to prolong political careers which should have been over the day they lost last year's election.
Lien's career is over anyway, now that he has reluctantly stepped down as KMT chairman. As for Soong, his political influence has rapidly declined to the point that it could hardly be damaged any more.
The feud between Chen, Lien and Soong that started with the 2000 presidential election has finally come to an end. However, those hoping that inter-party hostility and obstructionism could be replaced by cooperation remain disappointed. Under the new leadership of KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS